This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Measurement properties of painDETECT: Rasch analysis of responses from community-dwelling adults with neuropathic pain
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 December 2015
Accepted: 20 February 2017
Published: 4 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Umesh Badrising|
|3 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Walk|
|4 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tara Packham|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tara Packham|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christina Jerosch-Herold|
|8 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Tara Packham|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0825-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.