This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effectiveness of the capsaicin 8% patch in the management of peripheral neuropathic pain in European clinical practice: the ASCEND study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 23 August 2016
Accepted: 13 March 2017
Published: 21 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Line Jacques|
|25 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Ney|
|25 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Colette Mankowski|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Ney|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0836-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.