Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Double or nothing: red flag symptoms of critical carotid stenosis, a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Abdelsadik
20 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabella Canavero
1 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - José Morán-Sánchez
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Abdelsadik
27 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabella Canavero
29 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - José Morán-Sánchez
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mohamed Abdelsadik
19 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabella Canavero
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0849-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement