Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The effectiveness of creatine treatment for Parkinson’s disease: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ying-Zu Huang
15 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cristoforo Comi
11 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jia-Jie Mo
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cristoforo Comi
21 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ying-Zu Huang
2 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jia-Jie Mo
Resubmission - Version 3
2 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jia-Jie Mo
Resubmission - Version 4
13 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 May 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0885-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement