Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of included papers

From: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of group self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy

Author

Participants

Intervention (int.)

Facilitator

Control

Outcome measures

Main findings

Aliasgharpour et al. [33]

60 PWE randomised

Aged 18–70

Diagnosed for ≥1 yr.

Experienced seizures in the past year

1 month educational int.

Four 2 hr sessions

Face-to-face lectures with case histories, demonstrations and information leaflets to take away

Group size: 4–6. Discrete intervention

Master’s student in nursing

TAU

ESMS

Pre-intervention and 1 month follow-up

Self-management score significantly improved in int. vs control

Au et al. [37]

17 adults with

epilepsy (age range not specified)

≥ 2 seizures a month

8 week psychological CBT int.

Eight 2 hr structured sessions

Group size: 8

Discrete intervention

2 clinical psychologists trained in seizure management

TAU

QOLIE-31, ESES, seizure frequency

3 months pre-int. and

3 month follow-up

Significant improvement in QoL and self-efficacy scores in intervention group vs control

No difference in seizure frequency

Fraser et al. [35]

83 PWE randomised

Age ≥ 18

Diagnosed for ≥6 months

8 week psychoeducational int.

Eight 75 min sessions

Presentations, facilitated discussion and workbook

Group size: 6–8. Discrete int.

Rehabilitation psychologist and trained peer mentor

WC

QOLIE-31, ESMS, ESES,

PHQ-9, GAD-7

Pre-int., 8 week and 6 month follow-up

QoL, self-efficacy and PHQ-9 scores improved at 8 weeks in int. group but not significant at 6 months.

Self-management significantly improved at 6 months

Helde et al. [29]

111 PWE aged 16–70

Diagnosed for ≥1 yr.

≥ 1 seizure in the past yr

1 day educational int.

Information and discussion about epilepsy and psychosocial aspects

Group size: 5–11

Additional input: telephone follow-up and 1–1 counselling from nurse

MDT (the study nurse, neurologist, social worker, and neurophysiologist)

TAU

QOLIE-89 and general patient satisfaction score

Pre-randomisation and at

2 year follow-up

Significant improvement in QoL score in int. group at follow-up but no sig difference between int. and control

Significant increase in satisfaction in int. vs control

Ibinda et al. [34]

738 PWE randomised

581 data analysed

≥ 1 seizure in the past yr

1 day educational int.

Information about epilepsy provided using role play, discussion, narratives and brochure on the topics was given

Group size: up to 20. Discrete int.

Non-specific ‘researchers

and field staff’

WC

AED adherence, seizure frequency, KEBAS

(Kilifi epilepsy beliefs and

Attitudes scores)

Pre-int. and after 1 year follow-up

Significantly improved KEBAS scores in int. vs control at follow-up.

No difference in adherence or seizure frequency between the groups (both improved significantly)

Losada-Comacho et al. [28]

182 women with

epilepsy randomised

Age ≥ 18

Diagnosed ≥1 yr.

≥ 1 seizure in the past 3 yrs

Educational int. part of pharmaceutical care programme

Monthly lectures and information brochures

Group size: not specified

Additional input: 1–1 medication reviews. Given adherence aids and seizure journals

Pharmacist trained in epilepsy management

TAU and seizure

Information brochure

QOLIE-31, seizure frequency, adverse events,CES-D

(depression), Haynes-Sackett and Morinski-Green tests (medication adherence)

Pre-int. and after 6 month follow-up

Highly significant improvement in QoL score between int. and control groups at follow-up.

Other outcomes not reported in the paper

Lundgren et al. [30]

27 PWE randomised Aged 21–55 ≥ 4 seizures in the past 3 months

Psychological ACT int.

Two 3 hr sessions

Group size: 6–8

Additional input: Two individual 90 min sessions, individualised seizure control techniques

2 clinical psychologists

Supportive therapy

WHOQOL-BREF, SWLS, seizure index

Pre-int, post-int, and at 6 month and 1 year follow-up

Significant improvement in seizure index at all time points post-int. in int. group vs control. Significant improvement in QoL scores in int. group after 1 year

May and Pfafflin, [15]

383 PWE randomised

Age ≥ 16

Any duration or severity of epilepsy

2 day educational int.

Interactive course with 9 modules aiming to improve knowledge of epilepsy and psychosocial factors

Group size: not specified. Discrete int.

Non-specific ‘trainers’

TAU

SF-36, Depression Scale D-S′, Rosenberg self-esteem, stigma, restrictions due to epilepsy, epilepsy-related fears and mobility and leisure scales, specifically developed epilepsy knowledge and coping with epilepsy scales. Seizure frequency Pre-int. and 6 month follow-up

Significant improvement in knowledge and coping scales (specifically developed) in int. group.

Significant improvement in seizure frequency in int. group.

No impact on QoL (SF-36 score)

McLaughlin and McFarland, [32]

37 older adults with epilepsy

Age ≥ 60

6 week psychological CBT int.

Six 2 h sessions

Spector et al. protocol, modified for older adults with less content and diaries to aid memory

Group size: 6–7. Discrete int.

Psychologist with epilepsy expertise

Relaxation training

GDS, CIDI-auto, WPSI, seizure frequency

Pre-int, post-int. and after 3 month follow-up

Significant improvement in seizure frequency in int. group vs control.

No significant difference between groups in other measures but depression and psychosocial functioning improved in both.

Olley et al. [36]

30 PWE allocated to groups

Aged 21–65

2 day psychoeducational int.

Educational sessions and group discussion on epilepsy, stigma & management

Group size: not specified. Discrete int.

Non-specific ‘researcher/therapist’

WC

CCEI, BDI (psychological symptoms), knowledge about epilepsy

Pre-int, post-int and after 2 month follow-up

Significant improvement in int. group vs control in psychological scales and increased knowledge about epilepsy at follow-up

Pramuka et al. [31]

55 PWE randomised

Age ≥ 18

6 week psychoeducational int.

Six 2 hr sessions

Presentations, activities and discussion on medical and self-management topics

Written information provided

Group size: 4–12. Discrete int.

2 psychologists and 1 research associate

Guest lecture by nurse specialist

TAU

QOLIE-89, ESES, WPSI (psycho-social factors), locus of control scale, MCMI-III (depression)

Pre-int. and 1 month follow-up

Trends in improved direction in all measures, but only one QoL subscale showed significant improvement in int. group vs control at follow-up.

  1. PWE people with epilepsy; yr. year; int intervention; hr. hour; TAU treatment as usual; ESMS Epilepsy Self-Management Scale; CBT Cognitive Behaviour Therapy; QOLIE Quality of Life in Epilepsy; ESES Epilepsy Self-Efficacy Scale; QoL Quality of Life; WCwaitlist control; PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9; GAD-7 Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; MDT multidisciplinary team; ACT Acceptance and Commitment Therapy; WHOQOL-BREF World Health Organisation quality of life – abbreviated version; SWLS: Satisfaction with Life Scale; SF-36 36-item short form survey; GDS Geriatric Depression Scale; CIDI-auto Composite International Diagnostic Interview; WPSI Washington Psychosocial Seizure Inventory; CCEI Crown-Crisp Experiential Index; BDI Beck Depression Inventory; MCMI-III: Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory -III