Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality ratings and risk of bias

From: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of group self-management interventions for adults with epilepsy

Study

Quality appraisal

Risk of bias appraisal

Trial design

Participants

Intervention

Outcomes

Total (max 8)

Sequence generation

Risk of bias

Allocation concealment

Risk of bias

Aliasgharpour et al. [33]

1

1.75

2

2

6.75

Random number table

Low

Not described

Unclear

Au et al. [37]

0.75

2

2

2

6.75

Matched design

Unclear

Not described

Unclear

Fraser et al. [35]

1.75

2

1.75

2

7.5

Random number generator

Low

Not described

Unclear

Helde et al. [29]

1.25

2

2

2

7.25

Computer-generated block randomisation

Low

Research assistant blinded

Low

Ibinda et al. [34]

1.25

1.25

0.5

1.5

4.5

Computer-generated randomisation

Low

Not described

Unclear

Losada-Camacho et al. [28]

2

2

1.75

2

7.75

Drawing of ballot papers

Low

Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes

Low

Lundgren et al. [30]

1

2

2

2

7

Computer-generated randomisation

Low

Not described

Unclear

May and Pfafflin. [15]

1.25

2

0.75

1.5

5.5

Not described

Unclear

Not described

Unclear

McLaughlin and McFarland [32]

1

1.75

2

2

6.75

Computer-generated randomisation

Low

Not described

Unclear

Olley et al. [36]

1.5

2

1.25

1.75

6.5

Alternate clinic visit

High

Not described

Unclear

Pramuka et al. [31]

1.5

2

2

2

7.5

Random number table

Low

Consecutively numbered, sealed envelopes

Low