The Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study: design and methods for a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roland Faigle|
|1 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Berg|
|9 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frances Horgan|
|13 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marion Walker|
|7 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Pamela Duncan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marion Walker|
|16 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roland Faigle|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0907-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.