Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Nasal administration of the neuroprotective candidate NeuroEPO to healthy volunteers: a randomized, parallel, open-label safety study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Lazarowski
19 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William H. Frey
20 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miguel Tábuas-Pereira
26 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pei Xu
28 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karen Simonyan
29 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Orestes Santos-Morales
Resubmission - Version 2
29 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Lazarowski
8 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William H. Frey
20 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Orestes Santos-Morales
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
27 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0908-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement