Nasal administration of the neuroprotective candidate NeuroEPO to healthy volunteers: a randomized, parallel, open-label safety study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Lazarowski|
|19 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William H. Frey|
|20 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Miguel Tábuas-Pereira|
|26 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pei Xu|
|28 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Simonyan|
|29 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Orestes Santos-Morales|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Lazarowski|
|8 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William H. Frey|
|20 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Orestes Santos-Morales|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12883-017-0908-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.