Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparative assessment of clinical rating scales in Wilson’s disease

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chin-Chang Huang
2 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annu Aggarwal
19 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanna M. Volpert
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chin-Chang Huang
19 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annu Aggarwal
28 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanna M. Volpert
Resubmission - Version 3
28 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annu Aggarwal
27 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanna M. Volpert
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hanna M. Volpert
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0921-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement