Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Caught in a no-win situation: discussions about CCSVI between persons with multiple sclerosis and their neurologists – a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
12 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Rivera
4 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sascha Köpke
6 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - S. Michelle Driedger
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sascha Köpke
13 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Victor Rivera
2 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - S. Michelle Driedger
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - S. Michelle Driedger
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
7 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0954-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement