Open Peer Review Reports for: Caught in a no-win situation: discussions about CCSVI between persons with multiple sclerosis and their neurologists – a qualitative study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Mar 2017 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 May 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victor Rivera |
| 4 Jun 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sascha Köpke |
| 6 Jul 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - S. Michelle Driedger |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 6 Jul 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 11 Jul 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sascha Köpke |
| 13 Jul 2017 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victor Rivera |
| 2 Aug 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - S. Michelle Driedger |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 Aug 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 24 Aug 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - S. Michelle Driedger |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Aug 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Aug 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Sep 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12883-017-0954-7 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
