Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The usefulness of chief complaints to predict severity, ventilator dependence, treatment option, and short-term outcome of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome: a retrospective study

BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:200

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0982-3

Received: 1 July 2017

Accepted: 13 November 2017

Published: 21 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Donata Benedetti
14 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luana Benedetti
9 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ying Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
13 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
21 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-0982-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
(2)
Current address: Department of Life Sciences, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Beijing, China

Advertisement