Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Frequency of SCA8, SCA10, SCA12, SCA36, FXTAS and C9orf72 repeat expansions in SCA patients negative for the most common SCA subtypes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alfonso Fasano
13 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonio Elia
25 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hsiu-Chuan Wu
5 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gülsah Aydin
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alfonso Fasano
2 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Antonio Elia
17 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hsiu-Chuan Wu
23 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gülsah Aydin
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hsiu-Chuan Wu
6 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gülsah Aydin
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Gülsah Aydin
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
20 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12883-017-1009-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement