This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Chinese Cervicocephalic artery dissection study (CCADS): rationale and protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study
- Zhu Zhu†1,
- Yuyuan Xu†2, 3, 4, 5,
- Yilong Wang2, 3, 4, 5,
- Zhenhua Zhou6,
- Xiang Han1Email author,
- Aihua Liu7,
- Jing Peng3,
- Yi Xu1 and
- Luyao Wang4
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 21 August 2017
Accepted: 3 January 2018
Published: 11 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonio Arauz|
|24 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Zhu Zhu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Zhu Zhu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12883-018-1011-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.