This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Rationale and design of the CAROLINA® - cognition substudy: a randomised controlled trial on cognitive outcomes of linagliptin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
© The Author(s). 2018
Received: 10 May 2017
Accepted: 3 January 2018
Published: 15 January 2018
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Naomi Chaytor|
|5 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Donohue|
|14 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Geert Jan Biessels|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Donohue|
|17 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Geert Jan Biessels|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Jan 2018||Editorially accepted|
|15 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12883-018-1014-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.