Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Rationale and design of the CAROLINA® - cognition substudy: a randomised controlled trial on cognitive outcomes of linagliptin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
16 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Naomi Chaytor
5 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Donohue
14 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Geert Jan Biessels
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Donohue
17 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Geert Jan Biessels
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
3 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
15 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12883-018-1014-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement