Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Intracerebral hemorrhage after external ventricular drain placement: an evaluation of risk factors for post-procedural hemorrhagic complications

  • A. Shaun Rowe1Email author,
  • Derrick R. Rinehart2,
  • Stephanie Lezatte3 and
  • J. Russell Langdon4
BMC NeurologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201818:22

Received: 15 November 2017

Accepted: 28 February 2018

Published: 7 March 2018

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marc Alain Babi
19 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Christianson
2 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elissa Fory
31 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Anthony Rowe
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marc Alain Babi
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Feb 2018 Editorially accepted
7 Mar 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12883-018-1030-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

College of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville, USA
Department of Pharmacy, Parkwest Medical Center, Knoxville, USA
The University of Tennessee Medical Center, University Neurocritical Care, Knoxville, USA
Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, USA