Skip to main content

Table 3 eTIPS Feasibility Questionnaire

From: Feasibility trial of an early therapy in perinatal stroke (eTIPS)

Item

Description

Mother

Mother

Father

Father

1 m

6 m

1 m

6 m

 

Number in section A

12

11

9

7

A1

I understand the purpose of eTIPS

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

A2

I understand the types of things eTIPS requires me to do with my child

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

A3

I can see the potential value of eTIPS for my child

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

A4

I can easily fit eTIPS into my day

5 (3–5)

5 (4–5)

5 (3–5)

4 (3–5)

A5

It is easy to carry out the eTIPS approach with my child

5 (2–5)

5 (4–5)

4 (3–5)

4 (4–5)

A6

Using eTIPS disrupts my relationship with my child

0.5 (1–3)

1 (1–2)

2 (1–3)

1 (1–2)

A7

Sufficient training is provided for me to use eTIPS with my child

4.5 (3–5)

5 (2–5)

5 (3–5)

4 (3–5)

A8

My child tolerates eTIPS well

4.5 (3–5)

4 (4–5)

4 (4–5)

5 (4–5)

 

Number in section B

11

11

9

7

B1

When you use eTIPS, how familiar does it feel?

6.97 (1.91)

9.14 (0.84)

5.71 (2.44)

7.69 (1.76)

B2

Do you feel eTIPS is currently a normal part of your day/time with your child?

6.95 (1.90)

9.36 (0.81)

6.24 (2.07)

7.81 (2.07)

B3

Do you feel eTIPS will become a normal part of your day/time with your child?

9.13 (1.29)

9.45 (0.82)

9.26 (0.78)

8.97 (0.94)

  1. A 5 point Likert scale was used: 1 = “strongly disagree”; 2 = “disagree”; 3 = “neither agree nor disagree”; 4 = “agree”; 5 = “strongly agree”. Median values for each of items A1–8, with minimum and maximum in brackets. For items B1–3, mean and standard deviation are given as these were represented as a continuous scale (0–10), with increasing scores representing increasing familiarity with/perceived normality of the approach