Assessment of fatigability in patients with spinal muscular atrophy: development and content validity of a set of endurance tests
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Oct 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Montes|
|11 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Rebecka Dahlqvist|
|19 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elena S Mazzone|
|4 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Bart Bartels|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Rebecka Dahlqvist|
|16 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Bart Bartels|
|16 Jan 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacqueline Montes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Bart Bartels|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|9 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12883-019-1244-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.