Skip to main content

Table 3 Genotype and allele frequency distributions of SNPs in hypertension/diabetes/smoking and their controls

From: Interaction between COX-1 and COX-2 increases susceptibility to ischemic stroke in a Chinese population

 

Hypertension

Diabetes

Smoking

control = 1098(%)

n = 883(%)

P value

control = 1561(%)

n = 420(%)

P value

control = 1368(%)

n = 613(%)

P value

rs5788

 CC

991(90.3)

793(89.8)

–

1399(89.6)

385(91.7)

–

1242(90.8)

542(88.4)

–

 CA

103(9.4)

88(10.0)

0.915

156(10.0)

35(8.3)

0.259

123(9.0)

68(11.1)

0.050

 AA

4(0.4)

2(0.2)

0.947

6(0.4)

0

NA

3(0.2)

3(0.5)

0.269

 CA + AA vs CC

–

–

0.338

–

–

0.195

–

–

0.034

 AA vs CC + CA

–

 

0.930

–

–

NA

–

–

0.286

 C

2085(94.9)

1674(94.8)

–

2954(94.6)

805(95.8)

–

2607(95.3)

1152(94.0)

–

 A

111(5.1)

92(5.2)

0.502

168(5.4)

35(4.2)

0.084

129(4.7)

74(6.0)

0.081

rs1330344

 GG

168(15.3)

135(15.3)

–

229(14.7)

74(17.6)

–

218(15.9)

85(13.9)

–

 GA

549(50.0)

417(47.2)

0.188

790(50.6)

176(41.9)

0.047

654(47.8)

312(50.9)

0.102

 AA

381(34.7)

331(37.5)

0.121

542(34.7)

170(40.5)

0.887

496(36.3)

216(35.2)

0.133

 GA + AA vs GG

–

–

0.128

–

–

0.270

–

–

0.092

 AA vs GG + GA

–

–

0.388

–

–

0.025

–

–

0.662

 G

885(40.3)

687(38.9)

–

1248(40.0)

324(38.6)

–

1090(39.8)

482(39.3)

–

 A

1311(59.7)

1079(61.1)

0.284

1874(60.0)

516(61.4)

0.470

1646(60.2)

744(60.7)

0.649

rs3842788

 GG

978(89.1)

779(88.2)

–

1378(88.3)

379(90.2)

–

1198(87.6)

559(91.2)

–

 GA

118(10.7)

97(11.0)

0.381

176(11.3)

39(9.3)

0.337

163(11.9)

52(8.5)

0.030

 AA

2(0.2)

7(0.8)

0.286

7(0.4)

2(0.5)

0.474

7(0.5)

2(0.3)

0.506

GA + AA vs GG

–

–

0.284

–

–

0.274

–

–

0.025

AA vs GG + GA

–

–

0.294

–

–

0.490

–

–

0.535

 G

2074(94.4)

1655(93.7)

–

2932(93.9)

797(94.9)

–

2559(93.50

1170(95.4)

–

 A

122(5.6)

111(6.3)

0.173

190(6.1)

43(5.1)

0.197

177(6.5)

56(4.6)

0.023

rs20417

 GG

988(90.0)

801(90.7)

–

1399(89.6)

390(92.9)

–

1236(90.4)

553(90.2)

–

 GC

107(9.7)

77(8.7)

0.868

157(10.1)

27(6.4)

0.036

124(9.1)

60(9.8)

0.733

 CC

3(0.3)

5(0.6)

0.249

5(0.3)

3(0.7)

0.306

8(0.6)

0

NA

 GC + CC vs GG

–

–

0.942

–

–

0.067

–

–

0.955

 CC vs GG + GC

–

–

0.248

–

–

0.285

–

–

NA

 G

2083(94.9)

1679(95.1)

–

2955(94.7)

807(96.1)

–

2596(94.9)

1166(95.1)

–

 C

113(5.1)

87(4.9)

0.762

167(5.3)

33(3.9)

0.093

140(5.1)

60(4.9)

0.881

rs689466

 GG

241(21.9)

189(21.4)

–

324(20.8)

106(25.2)

–

297(21.7)

133(21.7)

–

 GA

560(51.0)

431(48.8)

0.374

786(50.4)

205(48.8)

0.229

692(50.6)

299(48.8)

0.792

 AA

297(27.0)

263(29.8)

0.063

451(28.9)

109(26.0)

0.036

379(27.7)

181(29.5)

0.745

 GA + AA vs GG

–

–

0.164

–

–

0.085

–

–

0.750

 AA vs GG + GA

–

–

0.094

–

–

0.087

–

–

0.835

 G

1042(47.4)

809(45.8)

–

1434(45.9)

417(49.6)

–

1286(47.0)

565(46.1)

–

 A

1154(52.6)

957(54.2)

0.063

1688(54.1)

423(50.4)

0.025

1450(53.0)

661(53.9)

0.317

  1. Using multivariate analysis after adjusting for age, gender and traditional risk factors
  2. P < 0.05 in bold