Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 13 enrolled RCT studies

From: Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc degenerative diseases on the basis of more than 60 months of follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

Year

CDA (N)

CDA (Age)

CDA (Male %)

ACDF (N)

ACDF (Age)

ACDF (Male %)

Prothesis

Follow-up

Burkus et al.

2014

276

43.3

46.4

265

43.9

46.0

Prestige

84 months

Coric et al.

2013

41

49.5

39.0

33

49.3

42.4

Bryan and KineflexC

72 months

Ghobrial et al.

2018

242

Not provided

Not provided

221

Not provided

Not provided

Bryan

120 months

Gornet et al.

2016

280

44.5 ± 8.8

46.1

265

43.9 ± 8.8

46

Prestige LP

84 months

Hisey et al.

2016

164

43.3 ± 9.2

47.6

81

44.0 ± 8.2

44.4

Mobi-C

60 months

Jackson et al.

2016

413

Not provided

Not provided

186

Not provided

Not provided

Mobi-C

60 months

Janssen et al.

2015

103

42.1 ± 8.4

45

106

43.5 ± 7.2

46

ProDisc-C

84 months

Lanman et al.

2017

209

47.1 ± 8.3

44

188

47.3 ± 7.7

47.9

Prestige LP

84 months

Loimeau et al.

2016

22

Not provided

Not provided

22

Not provided

Not provided

ProDisc-C

84 months

Miller et al.

2018

34

Not provided

Not provided

36

Not provided

Not provided

Bryan

84 months

Philips et al.

2015

224

Not provided

Not provided

192

Not provided

Not provided

PCM

60 months

Radcliff et al.

2017

389

44.5 ± 8.6

49

186

45.2 ± 8.1

43.5

Mobi-C

84 months

Sasso et al.

2016

22

Not provided

Not provided

25

Not provided

Not provided

Bryan

120 months