Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariable analysis of outcomes according to the eGFR

From: Influence of renal function on stroke outcome after mechanical thrombectomy: a prospective cohort study

 

eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)

 

≤44 (G3b–5)

n = 27

45–59 (G3a)

n = 46

60–89 (G2)

n = 170

≥90 (G1)

n = 130

p-trend

TICI 2b–3

 N (%)

24 (88.9)

39 (84.8)

146 (85.9)

118 (90.8)

 

 Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

0.75 (0.19–2.88) p = 0.67

0.52 (0.19–1.43) p = 0.206

0.59 (0.28–1.26) p = 0.175

–

0.506

 Model 1a OR (95% CI)

0.88 (0.21–3.77) p = 0.868

0.59 (0.20–1.74) p = 0.337

0.68 (0.29–1.60) p = 0.375

–

0.747

 Model 2b OR (95% CI)

0.89 (0.20–3.96) p = 0.882

0.67 (0.21–2.07) p = 0.481

0.71 (0.29–1.71) p = 0.443

–

0.855

sICH

 N (%)

5 (18.5)

10 (21.7)

17 (10.0)

8 (6.2)

 

 Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

3.44 (1.03–11.48)p = 0.045

4.32 (1.59–11.78)p = 0.004

1.74 (0.73–4.16) p = 0.215

–

0.021

 Model 1a OR (95% CI)

3.27 (0.86–12.40) p = 0.081

4.15 (1.41–12.24)p = 0.01

1.67 (0.63–4.46) p = 0.305

–

0.042

 Model 2c OR (95% CI)

2.12 (0.48–9.35) p = 0.320

4.07 (1.30–12.75)p = 0.016

1.71 (0.61–4.83) p = 0.311

–

0.095

Death, in hospital

 N (%)

5 (18.5)

9 (19.6)

23 (13.5)

13 (10.0)

 

 Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

2.05 (0.66–6.32) p = 0.214

2.19 (0.87–5.53) p = 0.098

1.41 (0.68–2.90) p = 0.353

–

0.343

 Model 1a OR (95% CI)

1.73 (0.49–6.09) p = 0.392

1.90 (0.69–5.21) p = 0.213

1.25 (0.54–2.86) p = 0.602

–

0.604

 Model 2d OR (95% CI)

1.21 (0.29–5.08) p = 0.793

1.33 (0.42–4.19) p = 0.627

1.12 (0.45–2.81) p = 0.807

 

0.970

Death, 3me

 N (%)

10 (38.5)

12 (26.7)

44 (27.0)

16 (12.9)

 

 Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

4.22 (1.63–10.89)p = 0.003

2.46 (1.06–5.71)p = 0.037

2.50 (1.33–4.68)p = 0.004

–

0.008

 Model 1a OR (95% CI)

3.36 (1.18–9.53)p = 0.023

2.07 (0.84–5.10) p = 0.114

2.11 (1.03–4.29)p = 0.04

–

0.107

 Model 2f OR (95% CI)

3.46 (1.17–10.26)p = 0.025

1.85 (0.71–4.80) p = 0.206

2.09 (0.99–4.41) p = 0.054

–

0.13

mRS 3–6, 3me

 N (%)

20 (76.9)

32 (71.1)

116 (71.2)

60 (48.4)

 

 Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

3.56 (1.34–9.45)p = 0.011

2.63 (1.26–5.47)p = 0.01

2.63 (1.62–4.29)p < 0.001

–

< 0.001

 Model 1a OR (95% CI)

1.76 (0.61–5.07) p = 0.293

1.63 (0.74–3.60) p = 0.230

1.51 (0.85–2.67) p = 0.159

–

0.448

 Model 2g OR (95% CI)

1.47 (0.45–4.77) p = 0.524

1.53 (0.62–3.76) p = 0.353

1.48 (0.78–2.83) p = 0.232

–

0.644

  1. a Adjusted for age and sex
  2. b Adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, OTT and glucose
  3. c Adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, OTT, previous TIA/stroke, SBP and glucose
  4. d Adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, OTT, coronary artery disease, PT/INR and glucose
  5. e 15 patients were lost to follow-up. 6 in G1, 7 in G2, 1 in G3a, 1 in G3b–5
  6. f Adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, OTT and glucose
  7. g Adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS, OTT, atrial fibrillation, smoking, glucose and HDL
Back to article page

BMC Neurology

ISSN: 1471-2377

Contact us