Table 4 Statistical data by evaluation criteria

Herbert, M. S

ACT /in person

PSQI

8,

60 min

12.48 (0.49)

11.58 (0.52)

6 month, 11.78 (0.55)

Samples T test

_

_

_

difference in change pre-post, −0.21(− 1.63_1.20),

difference in change pre-follow up, − 0.14(− 1.69_1.42)

ACT/ tele health

PSQI

8,

60 min

12.16 (0.50)

11.47 (0.61)

6 month, 11.59 (0.67)

_

_

_

Khazaie, H.

ACT

PSQI

8,

60 min

15.58 (2.31)

5.17 (2.88)

3 month, 3.17 (2.03)

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

1

0.001

F = 433.77

_

Simister, H. D

ACT+TAU

PSQI

7

12.67 (3.80)

10.24 (3.60)

10.70 (4.71)

Linear mixed effects modeling (LMM)

df1 = 2

0.055

_

d(pre-post) =0.79 (0.26–1.31)

TAU

PSQI

7

13.26 (3.80)

13.00 (3.47)

_

_

d(pre-follow up) = 0.53 (0.2–1.04)

Zakiei, A.

ACT

PSQI

8,

60 min

16 ± 2.44

5 ± 4

5 ± 4.08

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

_

< 0.01

_

Cohen’s d = 1.733

Päivi, L

ACT

ESS

6

6.85 (4.59)

5.67 (3.81)

5.20 (3.22)

Wald test

df = 1

0.001

W = 6.71

Cohen’s d (pre-post) = 0.41,

Cohen’s (pre-follow up) = 0.69

control

ESS

–

7.60 (4.28)

7.30 (5.09)

_

df = 2

<  0.001

W = 32.23

Wells-Di Gregorio, S. M.

ACT

ESS

3,

90 min

8.82 (1.11)

7.99 (1.24)

_

linear mixed models

_

0.66

_

_

control

ESS

–

8.09 (1.38)

7.91 (1.46)

_

_

0.66

_

_

Päivi, L

ACT

DBAS

6

96.33 (22.81)

86.57 (25.74)

77.47 (29.70)

Wald test

df = 1

0.001

W = 10.41

Cohen’s d (pre-post) = 0.53

control

–

87.93 (20.62)

89.55 (18.85)

_

df = 2

<  0.001

W = 34.86

Cohen’s (pre-follow up) = 0.71

Zakiei, A.

ACT

DBAS

8,

60 min

92.75 ± 5.85

34.25 ± 16.64

3 month, 34.25 ± 14.63

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

_

< 0.05

_

Cohen’s d = 1.781

Mosher, C. E(2019)

ACT

PROMIS (sleep disturbance)

6,

50 mintes

10.56 (0.71)

10.24 (0.78)

10.04 (0.78)

Linear mixed effeect model

74

0.69

F Value = 0.38

_

education support

PROMIS

–

11.24 (0.71)

10.15 (0.81)

9.85 (0.81)

ـ

ـ

ـ

ـ

Mosher, C. E(2018)

ACT

PROMIS (Sleep-disturbance)

6,

50–60 min

13.39 (3.24)

12.86 (3.06)

12 (3.27)

Linear mixed effeect model

ـ

0.14

β = − 0.49 (0.33)

d(pre-post) = −0.14

education support

PROMIS

–

11.5 (2.67)

10.96 (2.54)

9.92 (3.23)

ـ

ـ

ـ

d(pre-follow up) = −0.43

Mosher, C. E(2018)

ACT

PROMIS (sleep related impairment)

6,

50–60 min

23.04 (7.42)

21.61 (5.24)

21.04 (6.55)

Linear mixed effeect model

ـ

0.88

β = 0.11 (0.72)

d(pre-post) = − 0.27

education support

PROMIS

–

18.79 (6.35)

18.79 (4.51)

19.12 (4.97)

ـ

ـ

ـ

d(pre-follow up) = −0.31

Clarke, S. P.

ACT

ICOAP

6,

90 min

5 (3–7)

4 (3–6)

3 (2–4)

Mann-Whitney’s U test

ـ

P (pre-post) = 0.05

ـ

ـ

control

ICOAP

–

6 (4–7)

6 (5–8)

6 (5–7)

ـ

Farhang, Maryam

ACT

GHQ

8,

75 min

12.27 (3.35)

7 (2.41)

_

multivariate covariance analysis statistical test

1

0.001

F (pre) = 92.988

effect (pre) = 0.830

control

GHQ

–

12.82 (4.64)

12.73 (3.95)

_

ـ

ـ

F (post) = 81.154

effect (post) = 0.810

Päivi, L

ACT

BNSQ

6

21.77 (4.45)

19.91 (5.25)

18.35 (5.42)

Wald test

df = 1

0.001

W = 6.71

Cohen’s d (pre-post) = 0.42

control

BNSQ

–

21.65 (4.07)

21.57 (4.5)

_

df = 2

<  0.001

W = 32.23

Cohen’s (pre-follow up) = 0.69

Name

intervention / control

sleep diary

Number of sessions, time for presenting sessions

pre treatment

post treatment

follow up

statistical analysis

df

p

F

effect size

Wells-Di Gregorio, S. M.

ACT

SOL (min)

3,

90 min

52.16 (10.43)

30.78 (5.87)

_

linear mixed models

ـ

0.028

ـ

−0.86

Zakiei, A.

ACT

SOL

8,

60 min

1.52 (0.36)

0.96 (0.56)

_

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

ـ

< 0.05

ـ

2.806

Zetterqvist, V.

ACT

SOL (min)

7,

120 min

59 (0:39)

20 (0:10)

25 (0:17)

linear mixed effects models

_

_

_

g(pre-post) = 1.33(.25, 2.41), g (pre-follow up) = 1.08(−0.15, 2.32)

Wells-Di Gregorio, S. M.

ACT

SE

3,

90 min

0.80 (0.027)

0.9 (0.019)

_

linear mixed models

_

0.0062

_

d = 1.08

Zakiei, A.

ACT

SE

8,

60 min

51.31 (10.6)

79.61 (10.77)

_

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

_

< 0.05

_

d = 2.28

Zetterqvist, V.

ACT

SE

7,

120 min

68.8 (13.9)

85.8 (6.5)

86.8 (6.7)

linear mixed effects models

_

_

_

g(pre-post) = −1.57(−2.63,-0.47), g (pre-follow up) = −1.58(−2.90,-0.26)

Zakiei, A.

ACT

TST

8,

60 min

4:17 (1:26)

6:03 (0:82)

_

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

_

< 0.05

_

d = 3.37

Zetterqvist, V.

ACT

TST

7,

120 min

5:46 (1:54)

5:56 (1:17)

6:43 (1:26)

linear mixed effects models

_

_

_

g(pre-post) = −0.10(−1.07, 0.87), g (pre-follow up) = − 0.54(− 1.71, 0.63)

Zakiei, A.

ACT

number of awakenings

8,

60 min

1.82 (0.29)

1.32 (1.76)

_

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

_

< 0.05

_

d = 1.76

Zakiei, A.

ACT

subjective quality

8,

60 min

4.07 (1.40)

5.67 (1.83)

_

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

_

< 0.05

_

d = 3.054

Zetterqvist, V.

ACT

WASO

7,

120 min

0:46 (0:32)

0:23 (0:33)

0:22 (0:19)

linear mixed effects models

_

_

_

g(pre-post) = −0.69(−0.31, 1.69), g (pre-follow up) = − 0.87(− 0.33, 2.08)