Table 1 Characteristics of Included Studies
From: Effect of rTMS on Parkinson’s cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author/Year | Subject | Age | Duration of disease | Stimulation Parameters | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Position | Session | Frequency | Intensity | ||||
Boggio 2005 [30] | 13 | 65.2 ± 1.65 | 6.7 ± 0.92 | Left DLPFC | 10 | 15 Hz | 110% RMT |
Cardoso 2007 [31] | 11 | 67 ± 8.3 | 11 ± 7.6 | Left DLPFC | 12 | 5 Hz | 120% RMT |
Epstein 2007 [32] | 14 | 62.0 | / | Left DLPFC | 10 | 10 Hz | 110% RMT |
Benninger 2009 [33] | 9 | 62.6 ± 9.6 | / | Left M1 | 1 | 50 Hz | 60% RMT |
Toshiaki 2009 [34] | 6 | 66.8 ± 3.4 | 7.17 ± 3.1 | Frontal region | 12 | 0.2 Hz | 120% RMT |
Sedlkov 2009 [35] | 10 | 63.7 ± 6.7 | 7.8 ± 6.5 | Left PMd | 1 | 10 Hz | 100% RMT |
DLPFC | 1 | 10 Hz | 100% RMT | ||||
OCO | 1 | 10 Hz | 100% RMT | ||||
Pal 2010 [36] | 12 | 68.5 ± 7.9 | 6 | Left DLPFC | 10 | 5 Hz | 90% RMT |
Kimura 2011 [37] | 12 | 69.2 ± 5.8 | 8.5 ± 4.4 | SMA | 4 | 0.2 Hz | / |
Srovnalova 2011 [18] | 10 | 66 ± 6 | 5.4 ± 2.45 | Left and right inferior frontal gyri | 1 | 25 Hz | 80% RMT |
Srovnalova 2012 [38] | 10 | 66.0 ± 6 | 5.4 ± 2.45 | Left DLPFC | 4 | 25 Hz | 80% RMT |
/ | Right DLPFC | 4 | 25 Hz | 80% RMT | |||
Chang 2017 [39] | 16 | 63.8 ± 8.3 | 9.1 ± 5.3 | M1-LL | 5 | 10 Hz | 90% RMT |
Dagan 2017 [40] | 7 | 74.6 ± 7.1 | 10.3 ± 3.8 | mPFC | 16 | 10 Hz | 100% RMT |
Buard 2018 [28] | 22 | / | / | Bilateral DLPFC | 10 | 20 Hz | / |
Cohen 2018 [27] | 21 | 64.4 ± 6.8 | 4.7 ± 3.4 | M1 + PFC | 24 | 1 Hz + 10 Hz | 110% + 100% RMT |