Fig. 2

Proportion of process quality aims met when comparing groups with overall high vs. low individual quality of care. Shown is the overall rate of meeting the maximum of 15 process quality aims that could apply to individual patients. Depicted is the rate once for all patients, and once separated by the groups of patients from whom overall rate of meeting the process quality aims was above or below the reference area (defined as below the lower 95% CI of the mean rate of process quality met). Certain quality aims such as assessment of aims for participation were always met, while others showed a greater variation with overall process quality such as assessment of depression by standardized scores. Some indicators applied to all patients (for example assessment of depression by a standardized score), others only to subgroups with certain deficits or needs (for example training for executive function was applicable only to patients with executive function deficits or help with socio-economic problems was only applicable to those expressing a need in this area). Details on the definition of indicators can also be found in Supplementary table 1