Indicators (percent of patients having received appropriate diagnostics and treatment) | Rating | Include in pilot study (yes/no) | % quality aims met (n) | Range among centers |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Documentation of peripheral or central deficits (n = 104) | 7 | Yes | 80 (n = 83) | 22–98 |
2. Standardized depression assessment (n = 104)a | 9 | Yes | 69 (n = 72) | 0–100 |
3. Indication for memory deficits (n = 85) and appropriate diagnosticsb | 8 | Yes | 96 (n = 82) | 91–100 |
4. Suspected defects in attention and appropriate diagnosticb(n = 98) | 8 | Yes | 98 (n = 96) | 91–100 |
5. Suspected defects in executive function (n = 73) and appropriate diagnosticsb | 8 | Yes | 99 (n = 72) | 91–100 |
6. Deficits in executive function (n = 73) and appropriate trainingc | 7 | Yes | 71 (n = 52) | 47–100 |
7. Attention deficits and appropriate training (n = 95)d | 8 | Yes | 44 (n = 42) | 0–88 |
8. Attention deficits and help to organize daily routines (n = 95) | 7 | Yes | 87 (n = 83) | 82–100 |
9. Severe memory problems and/or executive function deficits and inclusion of relatives in therapy (n = 64) | 8 | Yes | 67 (n = 43) | 47–100 |
10.offer to involve relatives (n = 104) | 9 | Yes | 84 (n = 87) | 44–100 |
11. Assessment of aims for participation in private and professional life (n = 104) | 9 | Yes | 100 (n = 104) | |
12.Open social-economic problems and mediation into provision of care (n = 62) | 7 | Yes | 65 (n = 40) | 5–100 |
13. Treatment plan for handling the emotional consequences (n = 104) | 8 | Yes | 92 (n = 96) | 80–100 |
14. Documentation that professional reintegration was successful (n = 72)e | 10 | Yes | 63 (n = 45) | 50–100 |
15. Counselling on fitness to drive (n = 104) | 7 | Yes | 88 (n = 92) | 60–96 |
16. Time between first contact in out-patient clinic and beginning of therapy < 1 month | 10 | Yes | 63 (n = 66) | 22–90 |