Skip to main content

Table 5 Results – Humanistic burden

From: Prevalence and burden of multiple sclerosis-related fatigue: a systematic literature review

Author (year)

Type of Analysis

Sample Size

Cut-off for Fatigue

Outcome

Predictor(s)

Value

95% CI

p-value

Cioncoloni (2014)

Binary logistic regression

57

FSS ≥ 5

PCS (SF-36) < 40

FSS ≥ 5

OR = 11.00

2.97, 40.78

< 0.001

MCS (SF-36) < 40

OR = 8.64

2.39, 31.28

0.001

Filho (2019) a

Multiple linear regression

31

NR

Vitality (SF-36)

NR; included FSS (cut-off NR)

NR

NR

0.006

Physical Function (SF-36)

NR

NR

0.001

Fricska-Nagy (2016)

Multiple linear regression

428

NR

Overall QoL (MSQOL-54)

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS (cut-off NR), physical FIS, social FIS

β = 0.094

NR

0.320

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS, physical FIS (cut-off NR), social FIS

β = −0.785

NR

0.0001

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS, physical FIS, social FIS (cut-off NR)

β = − 0.152

NR

0.0001

Cognitive QoL (MSQOL-54)

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS (cut-off NR), physical FIS, social FIS

β = − 0.550

NR

0.0001

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS, physical FIS (cut-off NR), social FIS

β = −0.051

NR

0.475

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS, physical FIS, social FIS (cut-off NR)

β = −0.130

NR

0.097

Sexual QoL (MSQOL-54)

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS (cut-off NR), physical FIS, social FIS

β = −0.249

NR

0.001

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS, physical FIS (cut-off NR), social FIS

β = 0.008

NR

0.926

BDI-I, EDSS, cognitive FIS, physical FIS, social FIS (cut-off NR)

β = −0.185

NR

0.058

Goksel Karatepe (2011)

Hierarchical regression

79

FSS ≥ 4

Physical health (MSQOL-54)

Disease course, education level, employment status, BDI, EDSS, FSS ≥ 4

β = −1.641

−2.99, −0.29

0.018

Mental health (MSQOL-54)

β = −1.652

−3.26, −0.04

0.045

Gullo (2019)

T-test

62

MFIS, Cognitive > 20, Physical > 23

Physical summary (SF-36)

Cognitive fatigue (low vs. high; MFIS)

t = −0.31

NA

0.761

Physical fatigue (low vs. high; MFIS)

t = 3.24

NA

0.002

Mental summary (SF-36)

Cognitive fatigue (low vs. high; MFIS)

t = 4.82

NA

0.001

Physical fatigue (low vs. high; MFIS)

t = 1.90

NA

0.063

Kaya Aygunoglu (2015)

Pearson’s correlation

120

FSS ≥ 4

Physical and mental scores (MSQOL-54)

FSS

r = −0.58

NA

< 0.01

Leonavicius (2016)

Multiple linear regression

137

FSS ≥ 4

FSS ≥ 4

Gender, age, residence, education, marital status, professional activity, duration of RRMS, EDSS, DMT, sleep problems, HADS-D, HADS-A, MCS < 50 (SF-36), PCS < 50 (SF-36)

OR = 3.82

1.44, 5.54

NR

Gender, age, residence, education, marital status, professional activity, duration of RRMS, EDSS, DMT, sleep problems, HADS-D, HADS-A, MCS < 50 (SF-36), PCS < 50 (SF-36)

NR

NR

>  0.05

Schmidt (2019)

Multivariate linear regression

254

FSMC ≥43 mild, ≥53 moderate, ≥63 severe

Overall QoL (MusiQoL)

Physical exercise, family status, occupation, CES-D, FSMC (cut-off NR)

β = 4.75

1.73, 7.78

0.002

Family status, occupation, EDSS score, CES-D, FSMC (cut-off NR)

β = 3.46

0.51, 6.41

0.022

CES-D, FSMC, EDSS score (cut-off NR)

β = 4.98

2.10, 7.87

0.001

CES-D, FSMC, occupation, EDSS score (cut-off NR)

β = 4.17

1.29, 7.05

0.005

Takemoto (2015)

Wilcoxon test

210

MFIS-BR Absent: ≤38 points, Low: 39–58 points, High: ≥59 points

Utility score (Brazilian and UK algorithm)

MFIS-BR (absent vs. low vs. high)

NR

NA

< 0.001

Taveira (2019)

T-test

39

MFIS ≥38

FAMS

MFIS (fatigued vs non-fatigued)

NR

NA

0.001

Weiland (2015) b

Binary logistic regression

2090

FSS ≥ 4

FSS ≥ 4

Overall HRQoL domain (MSQOL-54)

OR = 0.94

0.93, 0.94

< 0.001

1802

Physical health composite (MSQOL-54)

OR = 0.91

0.90, 0.92

< 0.001

2131

Energy domain (MSQOL-54)

OR = 0.92

0.92, 0.93

< 0.001

2047

Mental health composite (MSQOL-54)

OR = 0.94

0.93, 0.94

< 0.001

  1. aConference abstract
  2. bFor every increase of one point in overall MSQOL-54 the odds of clinically significant fatigue reduced by 0.06, 0.09, 0.08, 0.06, respectively
  3. Abbreviations: BDI Beck Depression Inventory, BDI-I Beck Depression Inventory-First Edition, CES-D Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, CI confidence interval, DMT disease-modifying therapy, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale, FAMS Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis quality of life scale, FIS Fatigue Impact Scale, FSMC Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive functions, FSS Fatigue Severity Scale, HADS-A Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Anxiety, HADS-D Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale – Depression, HRQoL health-related quality of life, MCS mental component summary score of SF-36, MFIS Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, MFIS-BR MFIS, Brazilian Portuguese version, MSQOL-54 Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54, MusiQoL Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire, NR not reported, OR odds ratio, PCS physical component summary of SF-36, QoL quality of life, RRMS relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, SF-36 36-item Short Form health survey