Table 2 Pattern of weighted Degree of Centrality for each Region of interest
From: Mapping connectivity fingerprints for presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy
All patients (n = 30) | SF (n = 14) | Non-SF (n = 16) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Increased DC | Non-increased DC | Increased DC | Non-increased DC | Increased DC | Non-increased DC | |
Mesial – ipsilateral | 7 (23.3%) | 23 (76.7%) | 6 (42.9%) | 8 (57.1%) | 1 (6.3%) | 15 (93.8%) |
Temporal pole – ipsilateral | 17 (56.7%) | 13 (43.3%) | 12 (85.7%) | 2 (14.3%) | 5 (31.3%) | 11 (68.8%) |
Lateral temporal - ipsilateral | 29 (96.7%) | 1 (3.3%) | 14 (100%) | Nil | 15 (93.8%) | 1 (6.3%) |
Mesial – contralateral | 5 (16.7%) | 25 (83.3%) | 4 (28.6%) | 10 (71.4%) | 1 (6.3%) | 15 (93.8%) |
Temporal pole – contralateral | 14 (46.7%) | 16 (53.3%) | 8 (57.1%) | 6 (42.9%) | 6 (37.5%) | 10 (62.5%) |
Lateral temporal - contralateral | 28 (93.3%) | 2 (6.7%) | 14 (100%) | Nil | 14 (87.5%) | 2 (12.5%) |
HS patients (n = 23) | SF (n = 12) | Non-SF (n = 11) | ||||
Increased DC | Non-increased DC | Increased DC | Non-increased DC | Increased DC | Non-increased DC | |
Mesial – ipsilateral | 7 (30.4%) | 16 (69.6%) | 6 (50%) | 6 (50%) | 1 (9.1%) | 10 (90.9%) |
Temporal pole – ipsilateral | 13 (56.5%) | 10 (43.5%) | 10 (83.3%) | 2 (16.7%) | 3 (27.3%) | 8 (72.7%) |
Lateral temporal - ipsilateral | 22 (95.7%) | 1 (4.3%) | 12 (100%) | Nil | 15 (90.9%) | 1 (9.1%) |
Mesial – contralateral | 4 (17.4%) | 19 (82.6%) | 4 (33.3%) | 8 (66.7%) | Nil | 11 (100%) |
Temporal pole – contralateral | 10 (43.5%) | 13 (56.5%) | 8 (66.7%) | 4 (33.3%) | 2 (18.2%) | 9 (81.8%) |
Lateral temporal - contralateral | 22 (95.7%) | 1 (4.3%) | 12 (100%) | Nil | 10 (90.9%) | 1 (9.1%) |