Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics on rehab admission and at 6 months for mismatch and good match groups at 12 months, n (%) and median (Q1-Q3)

From: Evolution and prediction of mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function after stroke: a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study

Variable P-value Mismatch (n = 14) Range Good match (n = 15) Range
Rehab admission
 Em-NSA Exteroception (/32) 0.006** 22 (12–30) 0–32 31 (28–32) 20–32
 Em-NSA Proprioception (/8) 0.041* 7 (4–8) 0–8 8 (8–8) 6–8
 NSA Stereognosis (/22) 0.130 6 (1–20) 0–22 18 (15–19) 0–22
 Cognition (MoCA/30) 0.052 21 (16–24) 6–28 25 (22–27) 13–29
 HADS total score (/42) (n = 28) 0.548 11 (6–16) 1–18 9 (5–15) 0–21
 Barthel Index (/100) 0.217 48 (30–86) 20–100 75 (55–85) 30–100
Six months
 Em-NSA Exteroception (/32) 0.037* 30 (26–31) 0–32 32 (30–32) 29–32
 Em-NSA Proprioception (/8) 0.331 8 (8–8) 4–8 8 (8) 8–8
 NSA Stereognosis (/22) 0.012* 19 (11–20) 0–21 20 (19–21) 18–22
 Cognition (MoCA/30) 0.063 24 (22–26) 10–28 26 (24–28) 20–30
 HADS total score (/42) 0.080 9 (7–16) 1–21 7 (1–9) 0–18
 Barthel Index (/100) 0.063 98 (90–100) 45–100 100 (100–100) 95–100
  1. All between group comparisons were performed with Mann-Whitney U test
  2. Em-NSA Erasmus MC Modifications of the revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NSA: Nottingham Sensory Assessment
  3. *significant at p < 0.05
  4. ** Significant at p < 0.01