Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics on rehab admission and at 6 months for mismatch and good match groups at 12 months, n (%) and median (Q1-Q3)

From: Evolution and prediction of mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function after stroke: a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study

Variable

P-value

Mismatch (n = 14)

Range

Good match (n = 15)

Range

Rehab admission

 Em-NSA Exteroception (/32)

0.006**

22 (12–30)

0–32

31 (28–32)

20–32

 Em-NSA Proprioception (/8)

0.041*

7 (4–8)

0–8

8 (8–8)

6–8

 NSA Stereognosis (/22)

0.130

6 (1–20)

0–22

18 (15–19)

0–22

 Cognition (MoCA/30)

0.052

21 (16–24)

6–28

25 (22–27)

13–29

 HADS total score (/42) (n = 28)

0.548

11 (6–16)

1–18

9 (5–15)

0–21

 Barthel Index (/100)

0.217

48 (30–86)

20–100

75 (55–85)

30–100

Six months

 Em-NSA Exteroception (/32)

0.037*

30 (26–31)

0–32

32 (30–32)

29–32

 Em-NSA Proprioception (/8)

0.331

8 (8–8)

4–8

8 (8)

8–8

 NSA Stereognosis (/22)

0.012*

19 (11–20)

0–21

20 (19–21)

18–22

 Cognition (MoCA/30)

0.063

24 (22–26)

10–28

26 (24–28)

20–30

 HADS total score (/42)

0.080

9 (7–16)

1–21

7 (1–9)

0–18

 Barthel Index (/100)

0.063

98 (90–100)

45–100

100 (100–100)

95–100

  1. All between group comparisons were performed with Mann-Whitney U test
  2. Em-NSA Erasmus MC Modifications of the revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment, HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment; NSA: Nottingham Sensory Assessment
  3. *significant at p < 0.05
  4. ** Significant at p < 0.01