Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations between explanatory variables and overall QoL in DM1

From: Quality of life and subjective symptom impact in Japanese patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1

Explanatory variable

Model 1a

 

Model 2b

 
 

Coefficient (95% CI)

P-value

Coefficient (95% CI)

P-value

Demographic variables and functional impairment

 Sex

−0.11 (− 0.47, 0.26)

0.570

0.02 (− 0.18, 0.23)

0.834

 Age

0.08 (−0.14, 0.30)

0.485

−0.02 (− 0.15, 0.10)

0.722

 Years of education

0.05 (−0.16, 0.26)

0.616

0.00 (−0.11, 0.12)

0.982

 Disease duration

0.40 (0.20, 0.59)

< 0.001

0.12 (0.00, 0.23)

0.047

 Number of CTG repeats

−0.08 (−0.29, 0.12)

0.421

−0.06 (− 0.17, 0.05)

0.317

 Functional impairment

0.82 (0.40, 1.23)

< 0.001

0.31 (0.07, 0.56)

0.014

Subjective symptom impact

 Weakness

 

0.47 (0.30, 0.64)

< 0.001

 Pain

  

0.09 (−0.05, 0.23)

0.228

 Fatigue

  

0.22 (0.06, 0.38)

0.009

 Myotonia

 

0.16 (0.02, 0.29)

0.029

  1. a: Nagelkerke’s pseudo R2 = 0.41, AIC = 195.7
  2. b: Nagelkerke’s pseudo R2 = 0.84, AIC = 105.4
  3. CI confidence interval, AIC Akaike information criterion, QoL quality of life