Skip to main content

Table 3 Overview of study assessments

From: Opicapone versus placebo in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuation-associated pain: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind OCEAN (OpiCapone Effect on motor fluctuations and pAiN) trial

Category

Assessment

Primary efficacy endpoint

Change from baseline in Domain 3 (fluctuation-related pain) of KPPS

Key secondary endpoint

Change from baseline in Domain B (anxiety) of MDS-NMS

Additional secondary endpoints

Change from baseline in Domain A (depression) of MDS-NMS

Change from baseline in Domain K (sleep and wakefulness) of MDS-NMS

Change from baseline in MDS-NMS total score

Change from baseline in Domain 4 (nocturnal pain) of KPPS

Change from baseline in KPPS total score

Change from baseline in MDS-UPDRS Parts III and IV

Change from baseline in PDQ-8

CGI-C

PGI-C

Change from baseline in functional status via Hauser’s PD diary

Changes from baseline in morning dystonia

Use of rescue medicationa

Safety assessments

Incidence of TEAEs, including serious TEAEs

Changes from baseline in vital signs

Changes from baseline in physical and neurological examinations

Changes from baseline in routine laboratory parametersb

  1. aParacetamol or tramadol; bhaematology, serum biochemistry, pregnancy test
  2. CGI-C Clinical Global Impression of Change, KPPS King’s Parkinson’s Disease Pain Scale, MDS-NMS Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Non-Motor rating Scale, MDS-UPDRS Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, PD Parkinson’s disease, PDQ-8 8-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire, PGI-C Patient’s Global Impression of Change, TEAE treatment-emergent adverse event