Skip to main content

Table 5 Corticomotor activity after different tDCS interventions (n = 48)

From: Comparing different montages of transcranial direct current stimulation on dual-task walking and cortical activity in chronic stroke: double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Group

Anodal group (n = 12)

Bilateral group (n = 12)

Cathodal group (n = 12)

Sham group (n = 12)

 
 

pre

post

pre

post

pre

post

pre

post

p value

RMT (%)

58.0 (49.8, 63.8)

58.0 (50.5, 64.5)

63.0 (48.3, 69.5)

63.0 (48.5, 68.8)

62.5 (54.0, 65.8)

65.0 (53.5, 67.8)

57.0 (52.5, 65.5)

57.5 (52.5, 64.0)

 

change

0.0 (0.0, 2.0)

1.5 (0.0, 2.8)

2.0 (0.0, 3.0)

0.0 (0.0, 1.0)

0.153

SP (ms)

130.1

(110.2, 139.5)

124.1

(117.4, 136.8)

142.8

(117.2, 168.9)

154.5

(128.3, 189.8)

127.9

(118.8, 144.1)

139.4

(127.3, 156.4)#

144.7

(131.4, 156.5)

145.5

(130.4, 156.3)

 

change

-1.1 (-3.0, 6.4)

9.2 (3.0, 20.5)a,s

7.0 (3.4, 14.6)s

1.5 (-3.7, 3.6)

0.002

SICI (%)

49.1 (40.9, 58.6)

45.3 (34.3, 60.4)

46.0 (39.2, 65.7)

47.3 (37.7, 58.1)

42.2 (39.6, 48.9)

42.6 (34.4, 48.2)

42.4 (37.2, 63.4)

47.9 (38.2, 59.2)

 

change

-2.5 (-6.2, -0.1)

-1.6 (-11.9, 12.0)

1.2 (-9.0, 4.9)

2.8 (-1.7, 7.8)

0.296

  1. Data are presented as the median (interquartile range)
  2. Abbreviations: RMT, resting motor threshold; SP, silent period; SICI, short interval intracortical inhibition
  3. #, p < 0.05 for intragroup comparison. a, p < .05 as compared with Anodal group. s, p < .05 as compared with Sham group