Skip to main content

Table 4 Multiple regression analysis of referral modes among the three groups 

From: Influences of different referral modes on clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke

 

Unadjusted

Model I

Model II

OR/β(95%CI) P

OR/β(95%CI) P

OR/β(95%CI) P

sICH

Mode

 DD

1.0

1.0

1.0

 MS

0.78 (0.37, 1.65) 0.5168

0.77 (0.36, 1.64) 0.5015

0.50 (0.18, 1.38) 0.1830

 DS

0.81 (0.43, 1.52) 0.5067

0.83 (0.44, 1.56) 0.5530

0.47 (0.19, 1.16) 0.1000

Poor outcome

Mode

 DD

1.0

1.0

1.0

 MS

0.88 (0.47, 1.68) 0.7053

0.87 (0.45, 1.67) 0.6789

0.61 (0.25, 1.47) 0.2705

 DS

1.05 (0.60, 1.83) 0.8664

1.13 (0.64, 1.99) 0.6794

0.53 (0.24, 1.18) 0.1223

Mortality

Mode

 DD

1.0

1.0

1.0

 MS

1.03 (0.51, 2.09) 0.9267

1.05 (0.51, 2.15) 0.8886

0.56 (0.19, 1.67) 0.2993

 DS

1.34 (0.74, 2.43) 0.3361

1.44 (0.79, 2.65) 0.2372

0.65 (0.25, 1.69) 0.3744

Cost

Mode

 DD

0

0

0

 MS

20529.94 (3204.23, 37855.65) 0.0208

20535.56 (3122.93, 37948.20) 0.0214

30449.73 (11022.18, 49877.29) 0.0023

 DS

5834.54 (-9049.08, 20718.16) 0.4428

5910.74 (-9056.35, 20877.82) 0.4394

14630.17 (-2428.95, 31689.30) 0.0938

  1. Model I: adjusted for age and gender; Model II: adjusted the variables with statistical differences in univariate analysis Table S5, 6, 7 and 8 (P<0.1) and the covariates selected in Table S14, 15, 16, and 17 in the appendix; sICH Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage transformation, DD Drive the Doctor, MS Mothership, DS Drip and Ship.