Initial in-hospital heart rate is associated with three-month functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke

Background Increased heart rate (HR) has been associated with stroke risk and outcomes. Material and methods We analyzed 1,420 patients from a hospital-based stroke registry with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Mean initial in-hospital HR and the coefficient of variation of HR (HR-CV) were derived from the values recorded during the first 3 days of hospitalization. The study outcome was the 3-month functional outcome. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results A higher mean HR level was significantly and continuously associated with a higher probability of unfavorable functional outcomes. Compared with the reference group (mean HR < 70 beats per minute), the multivariate-adjusted OR for an unfavorable outcome was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.25–2.61) for a mean HR ≥ 70 and < 80 beats per minute, 2.52 (95% CI, 1.66 − 3.52) for a mean HR ≥ 80 and < 90 beats per minute, and 3.88 (95% CI, 2.20–6.85) for mean HR ≥ 90 beats per minute. For stroke patients with a history of hypertension, the multivariate-adjusted OR for patients with a HR-CV ≥ 0.12 (versus patients with a HR-CV < 0.08 as a reference) was 1.73 (95% CI, 1.11–2.70) for an unfavorable outcome. Conclusions Our results indicated that a high initial in-hospital HR was significantly associated with unfavorable 3-month functional outcomes in patients with AIS. In addition, stroke patients with a HR-CV ≥ 0.12 also had unfavorable outcomes compared with those with a HR-CV < 0.08 if they had a history of hypertension. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-021-02252-2.


Introduction
Although stroke severity and age are known to be powerful outcome predictors after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) [1][2][3], the prognosis of stroke patients is highly variable, and many previous studies have tried to identify outcome predictors in these patients to help guide treatment decisions [1]. Vital signs can help to detect or monitor medical problems, and many vital sign parameters have been associated with functional outcomes after stroke [4][5][6].
In older adults, lower HR variability and higher HR at rest have been associated with poor functional status and an increased risk of a subsequent decline in functional status independently of cardiovascular disease [13]. The Framingham study indicated that resting HR can be used to predict cardiovascular death in the general population [14]. In addition, a higher risk of mortality has been associated with a high resting HR independently of physical leisure activity and fitness and other well-known Open Access *Correspondence: jdlee540908@gmail.com 2 Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan Full list of author information is available at the end of the article cardiovascular risk factors [15]. Moreover, in patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension, an elevated HR at rest has been reported to be a predictive factor for overall and cardiovascular mortality independently of other risk factors [16,17].
Reducing HR was shown to protect mice from cerebral ischemia by reducing oxidative stress and improving endothelial function [18]. Patients with increased tachycardia burden during hospitalization for stroke have also been reported to have poor functional outcomes [19]. In addition, the Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes (PRoFESS) study reported that resting HR was an important prognostic factor for stroke survivors, and Bohm et al. reported that an elevated HR was strongly associated with the prognosis independently of co-variables including high BP [20]. However, another study reported that significant tachycardia and bradycardia could not independently predict the clinical course or outcomes in stroke patients [21].
Although HR variability measured by variations in the beat-to-beat interval has been shown to be an independent predictor of outcomes in patients with AIS [22,23], few studies have investigated the correlation between visit-to-visit HR variability and stroke outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between initial in-hospital HR and visit-to-visit variations with 3-month functional outcomes after AIS.

Subjects and data collection
Patients admitted for AIS at Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital who arrived within 3 days of symptom onset were consecutively identified between October 2013 and July 2018. Ischemic stroke was defined as the sudden onset of neurologic dysfunction caused by focal cerebral infarction and confirmed by imaging studies [24]. Key demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from the Stroke Registry in Chang Gung Healthcare System (SRICHS), including stroke severity as measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline [25]. The NIHSS score was assessed on admission by trained stroke neurologists. The recorded vital sign values for the enrolled subjects during the acute stage were downloaded from the Chang Gung Research Database [26], the largest multi-institutional electronic medical records collection in Taiwan, including systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), and HR. Routine hospital management strategies were based on current stroke guidelines [27]. The mean SBP, DBP, and HR and the coefficient of variation (CV) of HR (HR-CV) were derived from the vital sign values recorded during the initial 3 days after admission. CV was chosen as a measure of variation because it is more independent of the mean than standard deviation.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined using the equation proposed by the Taiwan Society of Nephrology as follows: estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) = 186 × (serum creatinine) −1.154 × (age) −0.203 × 0.742 (if female). Thrombolytic therapy was defined as the intravenous administration of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator or intraarterial thrombolysis in the acute phase of the stroke.

Study outcomes
The study outcome was death or major disability (unfavorable functional outcome), defined as a score of 3-6 on the modified Rankin Scale (scores ranging from 0 [no symptoms] to 5 [severe disability] and 6 [death]) at 3 months [28]. Information on functional status was collected via direct or telephone interviews with the patients, family members or caregivers by trained and certified research nurses.

Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and a P value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Quantitative variables were summarized as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range), depending on the distribution of the data, and categorical variables were presented as number (percentage). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between HR and 3-month functional outcomes. Formal analyses were performed using HR and HR-CV as a continuous and as a categorical variables as well. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated. In addition to crude ORs, adjusted ORs were estimated after adjustments for potential confounding factors in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. C-statistics were calculated to assess the predictive value of the multivariate model using the mean HR or HR-CV for functional outcomes.

Subject demographics
Among 2,687 patients who had AIS and were admitted to Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in the SRICHS, 2,482 patients were defined as having their first ever ischemic stroke. Of these patients, 555 were lost during the 3-month follow-up period, and 507 who had other specified conditions were excluded (Fig. 1). The remaining 1,420 patients were included in this study (mean age, 69.8 ± 14.3 years; 54.3% males). The clinical characteristics of the included patients are presented in Table 1.
Overall, 37.7% of the patients had unfavorable 3-month functional outcomes after AIS.

Association between the HR and three-month functional outcome in total stroke patients
The demographic and baseline data of the overall cohort stratified by HR (< 70 beats per minute (bpm), ≥ 70 and < 80 bpm, ≥ 80 and < 90 bpm, and ≥ 90 bpm) and HR-CV (< 0.08, ≥ 0.08 and < 0.10, ≥ 0.10 and < 0.12, ≥ 0.12) are shown in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The effects of the mean initial in-hospital HR and HR-CV levels on the risk of an unfavorable functional outcome are summarized in Table 4. When the NIHSS score was divided into three groups (mild, 0-6; moderate, 7-16; and severe, 17-40), there was a significant increase in the mean HR value across the groups (71.4 ± 11.3 bpm in the mild group, 79.1 ± 13.0 bpm in the moderate group, and 88.9 ± 14.6 bpm in the severe group, P for trend < 0.001). There was also a significant increase in HR-CV across the three NIHSS score groups (0.10 ± 0.04 in the mild group, 0.12 ± 0.05 in the moderate group, and 0.13 ± 0.06 in the severe group, P for trend < 0.001) (Supplementary Table 1). The multivariate models included age, sex, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, smoking status, body mass index, thrombolytic therapy, mean SBP, NIHSS score, and the levels of total cholesterol and eGFR for analysis including mean HR (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3); and age, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, thrombolytic therapy, mean SBP, NIHSS score, and the levels of triglycerides and eGFR for analysis including HR-CV (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5).
Compared with the reference group (mean HR < 70 bpm), the adjusted ORs for unfavorable functional outcomes were 1.81 (95% CI, 1.25-2.61) for a mean HR ≥ 70 and < 80 bpm, 2.52 (95% CI, 1.66 − 3.52) for a mean HR ≥ 80 and < 90 bpm, and 3.88 (95% CI, 2.20-6.85) for a mean HR ≥ 90 bpm. A higher mean HR was significantly and continuously associated with a lower probability of a favorable functional outcome. Likewise, the probability of an unfavorable functional outcome was higher for the patients with a HR-CV ≥ 0.12 compared with those with a HR-CV < 0.08 (unadjusted OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.28 − 2.23; P < 0.001); however, this association was no longer significant after multiple adjustments for potential confounding factors (P = 0.051).

Association between the HR and three-month functional outcome in stroke patients with history of hypertension
In order to evaluate the association between HR and functional outcomes in the patients with a history of hypertension, we also performed multivariate logistic regression analysis in this group of patients. The demographic and baseline data of the patients with a history of hypertension stratified into four groups by mean HR and HR-CV are given in Supplementary Tables 6 and 7, respectively. Table 5 shows the relationships between the initial in-hospital HR and 3-month functional outcomes in the patients with a history of hypertension. The multivariate models included age, body mass index, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, smoking status, eGFR, total cholesterol, thrombolytic therapy, mean SBP, and baseline NIHSS score for analysis including mean HR; and age, diabetes, dyslipidemia, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, triglycerides, thrombolytic therapy, mean SBP, mean DBP, and baseline NIHSS score for analysis including HR-CV.
For patients with a history of hypertension, a higher mean HR level was also associated with an increased risk of an unfavorable functional outcome as in the overall study cohort. In addition, the probability of an unfavorable functional outcome was higher in the patients with a HR-CV ≥ 0.12 compared with those with a HR-CV < 0.08, even after multiple adjustments for potential confounding factors (adjusted OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.11 − 2.70; P = 0.015) ( Table 5).
We calculated C-statistics in which mean HR and HR-CV were separately included in the multivariate models for the overall cohort and the patients with a history of hypertension, respectively. The C-statistics for an unfavorable functional outcome were 0.883 for analysis including the mean HR in the overall cohort and 0.879 for analysis including HR-CV in the patients with a history of hypertension.

Discussion
In this study, we showed that an increased mean initial in-hospital HR was associated with an unfavorable 3-month functional outcome in patients with AIS. In addition, for the AIS patients with a history of hypertension, compared with those with a HR-CV < 0.08, patients with a HR-CV ≥ 0.12 also had a higher probability of an unfavorable functional outcome.
Previous studies have reported inconsistent results with regards to the relationship between post-stroke HR and functional outcomes. Ritter et al. did not find associations between significant tachycardia and bradycardia and clinical outcomes [21]. However, other studies have suggested that an increased HR was unfavorable with regards to outcomes [4,19,20,[29][30][31]. In the PRoFESS study, there was a better 3-month functional outcome after recurrent stroke in patients with a lower HR [20]. In the present study, we also found that the probability of unfavorable functional outcomes increased progressively as the level of mean initial in-hospital HR increased.
The mechanisms underlying the association between post-stroke HR and clinical outcomes are currently unknown. Bohm et al. reported that a high resting HR was associated with the progression of atherosclerosis through a negative effect on the endothelium [32]. In addition, Custodis et al. demonstrated that reducing HR with ivabradine, an I(f ) current inhibitor, could restore endothelial function, reduce oxidative stress, and protect against focal brain ischemia by a markedly reducing the size of cerebral lesions in mice [18]. A high HR   Table 3 Demographic and baseline characteristics of the overall cohort stratified by the coefficient of variation of heart rate Data are n (%) for categorical data and mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) for continuous data, depending on the distribution of the data Abbreviations: HR-CV the coefficient of variation of heart rate, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, NIHSS National Institute of Health Stroke Scale may also reflect sympathetic nervous overactivity, which has been associated with inflammatory responses and an elevated BP at night, both of which are well-known predictors of mortality in stroke patients [33][34][35]. We also found that the mean initial in-hospital HR was associated with stroke severity in the present study (Supplementary Table 1). Although the effects of HR variability measured by the variation in beat-to-beat interval and visit-to-visit BP variability on functional and vascular outcomes after stroke have been well characterized [22,23,[36][37][38][39], few studies have investigated visit-to-visit HR variability. In the Ohasama study, day-by-day HR variability was associated with cardiovascular and cardiac mortality, but not stroke mortality [40]. Yang et al. reported that increased resting HR variability combined with an increase in long-term visit-to-visit SBP variability or vice versa may increase the risk of all-cause mortality in the general population [41]. In this study, a high HR-CV was not significantly associated with functional outcomes in the overall cohort, however, for patients with a history of hypertension, the risk of an unfavorable functional outcome was higher in the patients with a HR-CV ≥ 0.12 compared with those with a HR-CV < 0.08. Although the mechanisms for outcome prediction of visit-to-visit HR variation remains unknown, we speculate that the effect of visit-to-visit HR variation on functional outcome is more pronounced in patients with a history of hypertension.
There are several limitations to this study. We determined the mean HR and HR-CV levels by using initial 3-day  measurements and did not record the values at the same interval during hospitalization. In addition, the number of vital sign measurements was different for each patient, which may have resulted in both underestimation and overestimation of the association between the post-stroke HR levels and the study outcome. Another limitation is the lack of followup of all patients with AIS. The reason for this is a change in address and contact numbers of many of the patients admitted to our hospital, since most of them were elderly and their caregivers usually lived far from the hospital which limited their recruitment for the follow-up study.

Conclusion
Our data showed that a higher initial in-hospital HR was associated with an unfavorable functional outcome at 3 months in patients with AIS. However, these findings do not encourage the use of rate-slowing agents for patients with AIS at this stage. Further studies are required to elucidate the causality between HR and functional outcomes after AIS. Nevertheless, our findings suggest the potential role of HR and its modulation in future cardiovascular guidelines.