Data | Time | Subject of assessment |
---|---|---|
Demographics | Â | Â |
Age, gender, time post-stroke; weak side... | T0 | Comparison at baseline |
MMSE | T0 | Comparison at baseline |
Psychological assessment | T0 | Comparison at baseline |
Therapist' prediction on mental practice performance | T0 | Comparison at baseline |
Prognostic variables | Â | Â |
Amount of therapy/training | T0 | Prediction on outcome |
QEEG | T0 | Prediction on outcome |
Primary outcome | Â | Â |
11 point Likert scale: drinking and walking | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'activity' |
11 point Likert scale: Patient specific tasks | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'activity' |
Secondary outcome | Â | Â |
Motricity Index | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'function' |
Barthel ADL scale | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'function' |
Nine Hole Peg Test | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'function' |
Berg Balance Scale | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'function' |
Rivermead Mobility Index | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'activity' |
Ten metres walk time | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'activity' |
Timed up and go | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'activity' |
Functional Ambulation Cat. | T0, T1, T2 | Performance on physical level 'activity' |
Optional | Â | Â |
QEEG | T1, T2 | Performance on brain activity |
During six weeks intervention period | Â | Â |
Log | Daily | Â |
Interview | Once | A small sample (2× n = 10) will be interviewed to assess the patients opinion on feasibility of the program. |
Co interventions | T1, T2 | Process evaluation |