Skip to main content

Table 1 Synthesis of findings for interrater reliability, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of pain observational scales

From: Pain assessment tools in adults with communication disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis

Scale

Population

Interrater Reliabilityb

PAINAD

Cancer patients

0.97-0.98 (ICC); k=80

PACS

LAC

Elderly patients with dementia

0.917 (ICC 2,1)

CPOT

Critical patients

86-100%

FACS

Intellectual disabled patients

93%

CPOT

Mechanically ventilated patients

k=84

  

Test-Retest Reliabilityb

PACSLAC

Patients with post-stroke aphasia

0.88-0.95 (ICC)

FLACC

Elderly patients with dementia

0.73 (ICC)

  

Internal Consistencyb

CPOT

Mechanically ventilated patients

0.95 (Cronbach α)

Pain Indicators for Brain-Injured Patientsa

Patients with brain injury

0.95 (Cronbach α)

COMFORT

Mechanically ventilated patients

0.90 (Cronbach α)

PACSLAC II

Patients with post-stroke aphasia

0.83 (Cronbach α)

BPS

Mechanically ventilated patients

0.80-0.94 (Cronbach α)

0.77-0.95 (ICC)

PAINAD

Critical patients

0.80

PACSLAC

Patients with post-stroke aphasia

0.71 (Cronbach α)

NOPPAIN

Elderly patients with dementia

0.80-0.97 (Cronbach α)

PAINAD

Cancer patients

Patients with brain injury

0.72-0.75 (Cronbach α)

  1. aItems selected from CPOT and BPS
  2. bICC intraclass correlation coefficient (different types added when reported), ICC 2,1 two-way random absolute agreement, ICC<0.5 poor reliability, ICC 0.5-0.75 moderate reliability, ICC 0.75- 0.9 good reliability, ICC > 0.90 excellent reliability [39]