Skip to main content

Table 4 Fit indices and model comparisons of the one- and three-factor models for the RPQ proxy

From: Applicability and clinical utility of the German rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire in proxies of children after traumatic brain injury: an instrument validation study

Confirmatory Factor Analyses

Model Comparison

Model

χ2

df

χ2/df

p

CFI

TLI

RMSEA

CI90%

SRMR

∆χ2 (∆df)

p

One-factor

225.12

104

2.16

< 0.001

0.96

0.95

0.09

[0.07, 0.11]

0.12

–

–

Three-factor

149.30

101

1.48

0.001

0.98

0.98

0.06

[0.04, 0.08]

0.10

51.44 [3]

< 0.001

  1. χ2 = scaled chi-square value, df = scaled degree of freedom, χ2/df = ratio (cut-off: ≤ 2), p = scaled p-value, CFI = scaled Comparative Fit Index (cut-off:  ≥ 0.95), TLI = scaled Tucker-Lewis Index (cut-off: ≥ 0.95), RMSEA = scaled root mean square error of approximation (cut-off: ≤ 0.08) with 90% confidence interval (CI), SRMR = standardized root mean square (cut-off: ≤ 0.08), ∆χ2 = chi-square value of the difference test, ∆df = degrees of freedom of the difference test. Values in bold indicate at least satisfactory model fit according to the respective cut-offs, values in italics are significant at 5%.