Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of baseline data among the four groups of subjects

From: Computer-aided cognitive training combined with tDCS can improve post-stroke cognitive impairment and cerebral vasomotor function: a randomized controlled trial

Characteristic

CCT group

tDCS group

CACT group

CACT + tDCS group

X2/F/Z

P

Gender, n

Male

11

13

12

13

0.238a

1.000

Female

7

5

6

5

Age, yr

65.17 ± 3.26

58.50 ± 3.75

62.44 ± 2.76

61.06 ± 3.08

0.74b

0.532

BMI, kg/m2

23.88 ± 3.34

25.56 ± 2.93

23.36 ± 3.36

24.53 ± 3.26

1.333b

0.273

Affected hemisphere, n

  

left

5

7

9

11

0.213c

1.000

right

13

11

9

7

Duration of stroke, day, median [IQR]

29.5(15.3–95.8)

31.0(24.5–74.5)

38.5(12.5–99.3)

22.5(16.5–22.5)

1.569c

0.666

Education level, yr, median [IQR]

9(6–16)

12(8.3–15)

9(9–15)

12(9–15)

0.511c

0.916

SAS

28.89 ± 1.16

29.94 ± 1.39

29.33 ± 1.43

27.39 ± 1.19

0.732b

0.563

SDS

29.28 ± 1.42

31.89 ± 1.24

31.39 ± 1.29

31.17 ± 1.04

0.824b

0.485

  1. IQR: interquartile range; P value: a comparison between four groups
  2. a Analyzed by the χ2 test; bAnalyzed by one-way ANOVA test; cAnalyzed by the Kruskal‒Wallis test
  3. CCT: conventional cognitive training; tDCS: transcranial direct current stimulation; CACT: computer-aided cognitive training; BMI: Body mass index