Rationale and design of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nimodipine in preventing cognitive impairment in ischemic cerebrovascular events (NICE)
© Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 October 2011
Accepted: 27 August 2012
Published: 5 September 2012
Stroke is the second most common cause of mortality and the leading cause of neurological disability, cognitive impairment and dementia worldwide. Nimodipine is a dihydropyridinic calcium antagonist with a role in neuroprotection, making it a promising therapy for vascular cognitive impairment and dementia.
The NICE study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study being carried out in 23 centers in China. The study population includes patients aged 30–80 who have suffered an ischemic stroke (≤7 days). Participants are randomly allocated to nimodipine (90 mg/d) or placebo (90 mg/d). The primary efficacy is to evaluate the level of mild cognitive impairment following treatment of an ischemic stroke with nimodipine or placebo for 6 months. Safety is being assessed by observing side effects of nimodipine. Assuming a relative risk reduction of 22%, at least 656 patients are required in this study to obtain statistical power of 90%. The first patient was recruited in November 2010.
Previous studies suggested that nimodipine could improve cognitive function in vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease dementia. It is unclear that at which time-point intervention with nimodipine should occur. Therefore, the NICE study is designed to evaluate the benefits and safety of nimodipine, which was adminstered within seven days, in preventing/treating mild cognitive impairment following ischemic stroke.
It is well established that stroke contributes to about 5.4 million deaths per year and is the leading cause of neurological disability worldwide [1, 2]. Cerebrovascular disease is now one of the main diseases affecting the health of Chinese people [3, 4]. Motor and sensory impairment, cognitive impairment and even post-stroke dementia can be induced by stroke. Cognitive impairment and dementia following stroke can severely lower the ability of perform daily activities and decrease quality of life (QOL) in patients with stroke, and increase the rate of disability and death.
Cognitive impairment was proposed as a prognostic index of stroke by the Hachinski group in 2007 . Subclinical stroke and leukodystrophy may cause some cognitive changes in older patients, such as disturbances of thinking and reasoning, disturbances of memory and recall of recent events, and disorders of social behavior and depression [6, 7]. A population-based study in Japan observed that 42.5% of early-onset dementia cases were related to vascular diseases . Previous studies comparing patients with and without a stroke found that stroke was strongly associated with incident dementia [9–13]. Thus, prevention is crucial for both reduction of frequency of post-stroke cognitive decline and dementia and decreasing economic burden following stroke.
The worldwide therapeutic model for stroke treatment is transforming from a focus on improvement of somatic function to improving the whole QOL, including preventing and treating post-stroke dementia or vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) . Post-stroke cognitive impairment consists of vascular dementia, mixed dementia and non-dementia cognitive impairment [15, 16]. Vascular dementia can be been treated with cholinesterase inhibitors (Donepezil and Rivastigmine), N-methyl d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists (Memantine) and some nootropic drugs. However, previous studies showed that cholinesterase inhibitors had controversial roles in treating vascular diseases [17–19]. Memantine had only a small effect on improving cognitive impairment . In addition, previous studies did not supply any supportive evidence for the effect of Piracetam on vascular cognitive impairment . So far, clinical trials on the pharmacotherapy of vascular dementia for the above-mentioned drugs have yielded unsatisfactory results. In contrast, an evidence-based meta-analysis demonstrated that nimodipine could improve cognitive function in vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia and mixed dementia with good tolerance . Also, vascular dementia can be partly induced by altering intracellular calcium metabolism, although the mechanisms underlying the impact of cerebrovascular diseases on vascular dementia are not fully understood [23–25]. Therefore, the evidence is needed to choose a valid option for preventing and treating cognitive impairment after a stroke.
Rational and discussion
Nimodipine is a dihydropyridinic calcium antagonist that quickly and easily crosses the BBB and reaches a high concentration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). It improves cerebral perfusion after acute ischemia  and reduces neurological deficits [27–29]. It has specific affinity for receptor operated calcium channels in cerebral vessels and for specific membrane-located receptor sites that may be associated with the pharmacological action of nimodipine in the brain [30, 31]. Results from in vivo research showed that nimodipine also has a high affinity for specific binding sites in the cortex, the dentate gyrus and the hippocampus, which are known to be the core regions involved in cognitive function . Based on this evidence, many studies have tried to elucidate the role of nimodipine in treating cognitive impairment. A published Meta-analysis from 14 randomized, double-blind and control clinical trials (3166 cases) suggested that nimodipine (90 mg/d, 12–26 weeks) could improve the cognitive deficits caused by unclassified disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cerebrovascular disease, or mixed Alzheimer’s and cerebrovascular disease . A wide variety of scales, such as the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), short cognitive performance test (SKT), clinical global impression (CGI), Sandoz clinical assessment geriatric scale (SCAG) and Alzheimer’s disease assessment score-cognitive component (ADAS-cog), were adopted to evaluate cognitive impairment in this Meta-analysis. The results suggested that nimodipine could significantly delay the decrease in SCAG score [WMD (weighted mean difference) -11.75, 95% CI −15.64–-7.85, P < 0.00001] and CGI (WMD −1.31, 95% CI −1.73–-0.89, P <0.00001) at 12 weeks following stroke .
The first randomized, double-blind, controlled trial focusing on subcortical vascular dementia and multiple infarction dementia presented the results in 2005 . This study noted a 22.4% reduction in deterioration (3 or more point-drop versus baseline) on the MMSE within a 52-week period in nimodipine-treated patients when compared with the placebo group, who had similar demographic characteristics. There was also a significant delay in the deterioration of SCAG scores and significant improvement in SCAG scores.
The pivotal principal of cognitive impairment prevention following stroke is to intervene early rather than cure late. An important study in Hong Kong (China) was carried out to examine the effectiveness of nimodipine prevention/therapy on cognitive impairment in acute cerebral infarction patients, with the aim of demonstrating the effectiveness of early intervention after stroke . Although this study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial and enrolled 100 patients, promising results were found in acute cerebral infarction patients. In the intervention patients, Fuld object-memory evaluation (FOME) mean scores were significantly improved and the death rate did not increase within a 12-week period.
An important consideration is at which time-point intervention with nimodipine should occur. This varies between studies, as most are administered at a chronic stage (i.e. >6 months after the stroke) and 2 weeks after the stroke [22, 35]. However, a series of chain reactions induce a large amount of neuronal damage at acute and subacute stages of stroke . Theoretically, nimodipine could have clinical benefits due to its ability to modulate blood vessels and protect neurons, especially its probable ability to regulate the capillary with relatively intact structure and functions in the severely injured brain [27, 30, 37, 38]. It is thus conceivable that it is clinically beneficial to begin nimodipine therapy at early stage after the stroke.
The aim of this study is therefore to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of nimodipine, administered within seven days after an acute ischemic stroke, in the prevention of mild cognitive impairment.
The inclusion criteria are:
Male or female, aged 30-80;
Acute ischemic stroke diagnosed according to ICD-10 and CT/MRI criteria;
≤7d after the stroke;
MMSE score > Dementia threshold corrected based on educational year (>17 scores, >20 scores and >24 scores for illiterate, primary school, and above middle school respectively);
MoCA <26 scores for >12 educational years (or <25 scores for ≤12 educational years);
Hachinski ≥7 scores;
Expected good compliance with the therapy and follow-up. Already obtained written informed consent form.
Major exclusion criteria are:
Pregnant or lactating women;
History of mental diseases (eg. Schizophrenia and serious anxiety depression);
Patients with AD, Parkinson's disease, frontotemporal dementia or Huntington's disease (including the existing dementia diagnosed before the stroke or the past definite cognitive impairment);
Dementia of other causes (eg. injury of central nervous system, tumor, infection, metabolic disease, hydrocephalus at normal pressure, deficiency of folic acid/vitamin B12 and hypothyroidism);
Patients with other influencing factors for cognition evaluation (eg. aphasia, serious auditory/visual impairment and hemiplegia at dominant side);
Patients with contraindications for dihydropyridines;
Patients with serious arrhythmia, heart rate > 120 bpm (or < 50 bpm); ever myocardial infarction within 6 months; BP < 90/60 mmHg; serious heart failure (unable to engage in any physical activity, and dyspnea and cardiac edema or angina pectoris at rest);
Patients having serious kidney incompetence: Creatinine >1.5 times of upper limit of normal value (ULN);
Patients with serious liver incompetence: AST/ALT level >3 times of ULN;
History of known allergy;
History of blood coagulation dysfunction, hemorrhagic disease, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia or neutropenia, serious anemia, Hb < 100 g/L;
History of serious gastrointestinal disease;
Patients with any known malignant tumor;
Patients with epilepsy and/or ever having antiepileptic drugs.
The diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke is determined by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The threshold of MMSE scores is corrected based on years of education (>17 scores, >20 scores and >24 scores for illiterate, primary school, and above middle school respectively) . Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) scores are <26 for >12 educational years, and <25 for ≤12 educational years . Hachinski scores are ≥ 7 .
Ethics and informed consent
The study is being performed in accordance with the ethical principles proclaimed in the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964, and revised in Tokyo in 2004. The study protocol has been reviewed by independent ethics committees in China, and by coordinators, investigators, and sponsors in accordance with local regulations. According to local requirements, thorough study information is provided to patients and written informed consent is obtained from each patient or surrogate family member before inclusion in the study. The NICE study is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT01220622).
Treatment and follow-up
Blood pressure, temperature, and pulse rate;
Time from stroke onset;
Previous and ongoing medications;
Assessing vascular dementia according to National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, -and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l’Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria;
NIH stroke scale (NIHSS), ADAS-cog, Frontal assessment battery (FAB), Alberta stroke program early CT score (ASPECTS), Fazekas, The cholinergic pathways hyperintensities scale (CHIPS).
Follow-up visits are carried out at 1, 3, and 6 months (Figure 1). A physical examination is performed, and concomitant treatments are recorded at every visit. Compliance is determined by counting tablets at every visit. Cognitive function is assessed using MMSE, MoCA, ADAS-cog, and FAB, at 3 and 6 months.
Safety is evaluated at every visit, including adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE), regardless of whether they are related to the administration of the study drug or course of therapy. All AE or SAE are reported and followed up completely. Laboratory tests are collected at 3 and 6 months. Patients who break off study intervention and informally withdraw consent will be followed up for the duration of the study.
MMSE is widely used for assessing cognitive function [39, 42], and ADAS-cog also includes items used in evaluating cognitive function [43, 44]. These two criteria have high reliability, and have been used in other stroke trials [22, 33–35, 44]; therefore the validation of the study results is possible.
The primary end-point for evaluating the efficacy of nimodipine for prevention/treatment of cognitive impairment is 6 months after acute ischemic stroke events.
the efficacy criteria of MoCA (0–30) and FAB (0–18) at 3 and 6 months;
the efficacy criteria of MMSE and ADAS-cog at 3 months;
the individual items of ADAS-cog, MoCA and FAB at 3 months;
the individual items of ADAS-cog, MoCA and FAB at 6 months;
the time course of MMSE, ADAS-cog, MoCA and FAB;
In this multicenter trial, we plan to enroll approximately 656 patients, with approximately 328 patients per study group. Approximately 23 centers in China are participating, with each center enrolling about 30 patients. We assumed that there was no significant difference between nimodipine (90 mg/d) and placebo (90 mg/d) in the prevention/treatment of aggravated cognitive impairment of acute ischemic stroke in the 6 month follow-up. For a statistical power of at least 90% in this trial, we estimated that 656 patients are necessary to present the superiority of nimodipine versus placebo. This corresponds to a relative risk (RR) reduction of 22% (RR is 0.78 for the nimodipine group), using a two-sided test (α = 0.05, allowing 5% dropout). The efficacy analysis is based on an intention-to-treat method. Missing values are still treated as missing. Patients are examined at the last follow-up (at the occurrence of clinical event, the end of study, or the last follow-up before drop-out). A Kaplan-Meier curve is used to simulate the cumulative risk for cognitive impairment in the follow-up at day 180. The Cox proportional hazard model is used to calculate hazard proportion and 95% confidence interval. Log-rank test is used to evaluate the efficacy.
Most secondary outcome analyses will adopt the strategy of the primary outcome analyses. Continuous variables (for example MoCA and FAB) will undergo multi-variate linear regression analysis. Converted and/or weighted least square methods are regarded as abnormal and heterogeneous variance of remedial measures. Limit values will undergo a validity test. The conclusion will undergo sensitivity analysis.
The NICE trial is headed by a steering committee (Additional file 1: Appendix), which is assisted by an independent data safety and monitoring board (DSMB). Trial monitoring and data management is performed by Giant Med-Pharma Service Group. The Steering Committee will regularly review the status of the trial and available blinded data, and will perform appropriate actions according to the conduct of the study. A face-to-face Executive Committee meeting will be required to make major decisions. To ensure the study meets the highest standards of ethics and patient safety, the Safety and Monitoring Board will meet regularly and monitor the progress of the study. The Board is composed of Academic Members, including an independent statistician, who are not otherwise participating in the trial. Clinical end-point events (stroke, myocardial infarction, death, and overt bleedings) will be reviewed by independent experts (neurologists, cardiologists) in the Critical Events Committee. The sponsor of the NICE trial is the Minister of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China. The sponsor has no influence on the study design, data collection, data analysis, and final drafting of this manuscript.
The primary objective of this phase IV multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial is to prove the efficacy of nimodipine in the prevention/treatment of mild cognitive impairment following acute ischemic stroke. Approximate 23 centers in China are enrolled in the NICE trial, and the first patient was recruited into the study in November 2010. This trial analyses the safety of nimodipine and investigates several secondary outcomes. The results of the NICE study are expected in 2013.
Alzheimer’s disease assessment score-cognitive component
Alberta stroke program early CT score
Clinical global impression
The cholinergic pathways hyperintensities scale
Data safety and monitoring board
Frontal assessment battery
Fuld object-memory evaluation
International classification of diseases, tenth revision
Mini-Mental state examination
Montreal cognitive assessment
Magnetic resonance imaging
Nimodipine in Preventing Cognitive Impairment in Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
NIH stroke scale
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, -and the Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l’Enseignement en Neurosciences
Quality of life
Serious adverse event
Sandoz clinical assessment geriatric scale
Short cognitive performance test
Upper limit of normal value
Vascular cognitive impairment
Weighted mean difference.
We would like to express our deepest gratitude to all investigators of the NICE study in China, who are trying their best to carry out the study. We also thank Xuemei Wang and Linlong Lu for their assistant work before the Study. The NICE trial is supported by the Minister of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, which has no influence on the study design, data collection, data analysis, and final drafting of this manuscript.
- Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ: Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006, 367: 1747-1757. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meairs S, Wahlgren N, Dirnagl U, Lindvall O, Rothwell P, Baron JC, Hossmann K, Engelhardt B, Ferro J, McCulloch J, Kaste M, Endres M, Koistinaho J, Planas A, Vivien D, Dijkhuizen R, Czlonkowska A, Hagen A, Evans A, De Libero G, Nagy Z, Rastenyte D, Reess J, Davalos A, Lenzi GL, Amarenco P, Hennerici M: Stroke research priorities for the next decade–a representative view of the European scientific community. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006, 22: 75-82. 10.1159/000093098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu M, Wu B, Wang WZ, Lee LM, Zhang SH, Kong LZ: Stroke in China: epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6: 456-464. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70004-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi FL, Hart RG, Sherman DG, Tegeler CH: Stroke in the People's Republic of China. Stroke. 1989, 20: 1581-1585. 10.1161/01.STR.20.11.1581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hachinski V: The 2005 Thomas Willis Lecture: stroke and vascular cognitive impairment: a transdisciplinary, translational and transactional approach. Stroke. 2007, 38: 1396-10.1161/01.STR.0000260101.08944.e9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Merino JG: Untangling vascular cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2008, 39: 739-740. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.510289.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gorelick PB, Bowler JV: Advances in vascular cognitive impairment 2007. Stroke. 2008, 39: 279-282. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.509570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikejima C, Yasuno F, Mizukami K, Sasaki M, Tanimukai S, Asada T: Prevalence and causes of early-onset dementia in Japan: a population-based study. Stroke. 2009, 40: 2709-2714. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.542308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ivan CS, Seshadri S, Beiser A, Au R, Kase CS, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA: Dementia after stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2004, 35: 1264-1268. 10.1161/01.STR.0000127810.92616.78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madureira S, Guerreiro M, Ferro JM: Dementia and cognitive impairment three months after stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2001, 8: 621-627. 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2001.00332.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Ylikoski R, Hietanen M, Vataja R, Kaste M: Clinical determinants of poststroke dementia. Stroke. 1998, 29: 75-81. 10.1161/01.STR.29.1.75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Paik MC, Sano M, Mohr JP, Aboumatar S, Tseng CL, Chan S, Williams JB, Remien RH, Hauser WA, Stern Y: Frequency and clinical determinants of dementia after ischemic stroke. Neurol. 2000, 54: 1124-1131. 10.1212/WNL.54.5.1124.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tang WK, Chan SS, Chiu HF, Ungvari GS, Wong KS, Kwok TC, Mok V, Wong KT, Richards PS, Ahuja AT: Frequency and determinants of poststroke dementia in Chinese. Stroke. 2004, 35: 930-935. 10.1161/01.STR.0000119752.74880.5B.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hachinski V: World Stroke Day 2008: "little strokes, big trouble". Stroke. 2008, 39: 2407-2420. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.531681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yip AG, Brayne C, Matthews FE: Risk factors for incident dementia in England and Wales: The Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. A population-based nested case–control study. Age Ageing. 2006, 35: 154-160.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zekry D, Herrmann FR, Graf CE, Giannelli S, Michel JP, Gold G, Krause KH: Mild cognitive impairment, degenerative and vascular dementia as predictors of intra-hospital, short- and long-term mortality in the oldest old. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2011, 23: 60-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malouf R, Birks J: Donepezil for vascular cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 10.1002/14651858. 1
- Dichgans M, Markus HS, Salloway S, Verkkoniemi A, Moline M, Wang Q, Posner H, Chabriat HS: Donepezil in patients with subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: a randomised double-blind trial in CADASIL. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7: 310-318. 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70046-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ballard C, Sauter M, Scheltens P, He Y, Barkhof F, van Straaten EC, van der Flier WM, Hsu C, Wu S, Lane R: Efficacy, safety and tolerability of rivastigmine capsules in patients with probable vascular dementia: the VantagE study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008, 24: 2561-2574. 10.1185/03007990802328142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kavirajan H, Schneider LS: Efficacy and adverse effects of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6: 782-792. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70195-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flicker L, Grimley Evans G: Piracetam for dementia or cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001, 10.1002/14651858. 2
- López-Arrieta J, Birks J: Nimodipine for primary degenerative, mixed and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002, 10.1002/14651858. 3
- Inzitari D, Poggesi A: Calcium channel blockers and stroke. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005, 17 (Suppl 4): 16-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jellinger K: Pathology and pathophysiology of vascular cognitive impairment. A critical update. Panminerva Med. 2004, 46: 217-226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Werring D, Gregoire S, Cipolotti L: Cerebral microbleeds and vascular cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci. 2010, 299: 131-135. 10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Den Kerckhoff W, Drewes LR: Transfer of Nimodipine and another calcium antagonist across the blood–brain barrier and their regional distribution in vivo. Diagnosis and treatment of senile dementia. Edited by: Bergener M, Reisberg B. 1989, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 308-321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scriabine A, van den Kerckhoff W: Pharmacology of nimodipine. A review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988, 522: 698-706. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb33415.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osuga S, Hakim A, Osuga H, Hogan M: In vivo uptake of [3H]nimodipine into brain during cortical spreading depression. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997, 17: 586-590.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohamed A, Mendelow A, Teasdale G, Harper A, McCulloch J: Effect of the calcium antagonist nimodipine on local cerebral blood flow and metabolic coupling. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985, 5: 26-33. 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kazda S, Towart R: Nimodipine: a new calcium antagonistic drug with a preferential cerebrovascular action. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1982, 63: 259-265. 10.1007/BF01728880.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bellemann P, Schade A, Towart R: Dihydropyridine receptor in rat brain labeled with [3 H]nimodipine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983, 80: 2356-2360. 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2356.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pozzilli C, Di Piero V, Pantano P, Rasura M, Lenzi GL: Influence of nimodipine on cerebral blood flow in human cerebral ischaemia. J Neurol. 1989, 236: 199-202. 10.1007/BF00314499.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pantoni L, del Ser T, Soglian AG, Amigoni S, Spadari G, Binelli D, Inzitari D: Efficacy and safety of nimodipine in subcortical vascular dementia: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2005, 36: 619-624. 10.1161/01.STR.0000155686.73908.3e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sze KH, Sim TC, Wong E, Cheng S, Woo J: Effect of nimodipine on memory after cerebral infarction. Acta Neurol Scand. 1998, 97: 386-392. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1998.tb05971.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Birks J, López-Arrieta J: Nimodipine for primary degenerative, mixed and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, 10.1002/14651858. 7
- Arai K, Lok J, Guo S, Hayakawa K, Xing C, Lo EH: Cellular Mechanisms of Neurovascular Damage and Repair After Stroke. J Child Neurol. 2011, 26: 1193-1198. 10.1177/0883073811408610.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kazda S: Pharmacology of nimodipine, a calcium antagonist with preferential cerebrovascular activity. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1985, 28 (Suppl 1): 70-73.Google Scholar
- Uematsu D, Greenberg JH, Hickey WF, Reivich M: Nimodipine attenuates both increase in cytosolic free calcium and histologic damage following focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in cats. Stroke. 1989, 20: 1531-1537. 10.1161/01.STR.20.11.1531.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li G, Shen Y, Chen C, Li S, Zhao Y, Liu M, Xu L, Wang L, Wang Q: Study of simply measuring old dementia — using MMSE within elderly residents of the city. Chin Ment Health J. 1988, 2: 13-18.Google Scholar
- Wen H, Zhang Z, Niu F, Li L: The application of Montreal cognitive assessment in urban Chinese r nts of Beijin. Chin J Intern Med. 2008, 47: 36-39.Google Scholar
- Hachinski VC, Iliff LD, Zilhka E, Du BGH, McAllister VL, Marshall J, Russell RW, Symon L: Cerebral blood flow in dementia. Arch Neurol. 1975, 32: 632-637. 10.1001/archneur.1975.00490510088009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ban TA, Morey L, Aguglia E, Azzarelli O, Balsano F, Marigliano V, Caglieris N, Sterlicchio M, Capurso A, Tomasi NA, Crepaldif G, Volpef D, Palmierif G, Ambrosif G, Pollig E, Cortellarog M, Zanussih C, Froldii M: Nimodipine in the treatment of old age dementias. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1990, 14: 525-551. 10.1016/0278-5846(90)90005-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL: A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984, 141: 1356-1364.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wen HM, Mok VC, Fan YH, Lam WW, Tang WK, Wong A, Huang RX, Wong KS: Effect of white matter changes on cognitive impairment in patients with lacunar infarcts. Stroke. 2004, 35: 1826-1830. 10.1161/01.STR.0000133686.29320.58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/12/88/prepub