Etiologic subtype predicts outcome in mild stroke: prospective data from a hospital stroke registry
© Hao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 3 May 2013
Accepted: 15 October 2013
Published: 24 October 2013
Few studies on whether etiologic subtype can predict outcome in mild stroke are available. The study aim to explore the effect of different etiologic subtype on prognosis of these patients.
We prospectively registered consecutive cases of acute ischemic stroke from September. 01, 2009 to August. 31, 2011. Patients with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≦3 and within 30 days of symptom onset were included. All cause death or disability (defined as modified Rankin Scale >2) were followed up at 3 months. The multivariate logistical regression model was used to analyse relationship between etiologic subtype and clinical outcomes.
We included 680 cases, which accounted for 41.1% (680/1655) of the total registered cases. Mean age were 62.54 ± 13.51 years, and males were 65.4%. The median time of symptoms onset to admission was 72 hours. 3.8% (26/680) of cases admitted within 3 hours and 4.7% (32/680) admitted within 4.5 hours. However, no patient received intravenous thrombolysis. Of included patients, 21.5% large-artery atherosclerosis, 40.6% small-vessel disease, 7.5% cardioembolisms, 2.2% other causes and 28.2% undetermined causes. The rate of case fatality and death/disability was 2.2% and 10.1% respectively at 3 months. After adjustment of potential confounders, such as age, sex, NIHSS on admission and vascular risk factors et al., cardioembolism (RR = 3.395;95%CI 1.257 ~ 9.170) was the predictor of death or disability at 3 months and small vessel occlusion (RR = 0.412;95%CI 0.202 ~ 0.842) was the protective factor of death or disability at 3 months.
Different etiologic subtype can predict the outcome in patients with mild stroke and it can help to stratify these patients for individual decision-making.
KeywordsAcute ischemic stroke Minor stroke Etiology Death/disability
It is very common that acute ischemic stroke patients have mild symptoms or rapidly improving stroke symptoms, which makes the decisions of treatment in dilemma. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV rtPA) is proven to be the most effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke [1, 2]. However, only 1%-5% patients are treated with IV rtPA. In addition to the narrow time window for treatment, not treat patients with mild or rapidly improving symptoms is one important reason . In studies evaluating eligibility for thrombolysis, up to 43% of patients with mild or improving stroke symptoms do not receive thrombolytic therapy because of clinicians think the natural course of these patients is benign . However, according to recent reports, 15%–31% of patients with mild or rapidly improving symptoms have dependent or dead during hospital admission without thrombolysis [3, 5–7]. Therefore, early identification of these patients with poor outcome will contribute to the choice of early intervention to prevent the occurrence of poor outcomes. Studies suggest that mild stroke patients with large vessel occlusion are at a high risk for early neurological deterioration or poor outcome . Imaging with advanced MRI is one possibility to guide treatment decision in mild stroke [9–11]. Therapies directed at the underlying mechanism will be more effective. But there is still lack of clinical outcomes in patients with different etiologic subtype. This study aims to observe clinical characteristics and explore the effect of different etiologic subtype on prognosis of mild stroke.
Due to this is an observational study that will only assess outcomes in participants, all participants or their designated relatives provided verbal informed consent for obtaining relative prognostic information. This research project was approved by the Scientific Research Department of West China Hospital, which conformed to the local ethic criteria for human researches. We included acute ischemic stroke admitted consecutively to neurological wards of the West China Hospital, Sichuan University within 30 days of symptom onset between September. 01, 2009 to August. 31, 2011. All patients had a clinical diagnosis of stroke according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and intracranial hemorrhage were further excluded by CT or MRI scan in the hospital . Patients with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)≦3 were included  in this study.
Details of patient demographies, vascular risk factors, Blood pressure (BP) on admission, laboratory test, brain image data and complications were recorded at the time of assessment using a standardized structured form. Vascular risk factors included hypertension (HTN), diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease (CHD), history of stroke, status of smoking and alcohol. Severity of stroke was assessed using the NIHSS score. Medical complications include respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, electrolyte disturbances, hemorrhage of digestive tract and epilepsy. Determination of ischemic stroke etiology was according to the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria: large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA); small artery occlusion (SAO); cardioembolism (CE); stroke of other determined cause (OC); and stroke of undetermined cause (UND) .
Assessment of outcome
The main outcomes were death and disability at 3 month after onset. Death was all-cause case fatality. Disability was defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) > 2 . Patients were followed-up by telephone call, clinic interview or letter inquiry. To ensure the quality of information collection, all investigators received training in the beginning according to our standard operational manual. All data were recorded in a structured data sheet. The outcome assessors were blinded to the information of patients. The poor outcome defined as death or disability (mRS >2) at 3 months.
Differences between two groups were tested using t test, Mann–Whitney U test or Chi-Square test where appropriate. Variables that were identified as significant in the univariate analyses (P <0.10) were entered into multivariate logistic regression analyses. The multivariate logistical regression was used to analyze association between different etiologic subtype and clinical outcomes, adjusting for all potential confounders including age, sex, NIHSS on admission, vascular risk factors and complications et al. Data are reported with Relative Risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0 (SPSS Inc.).
Characteristics of patients with minor stroke according to outcomes
Death/disability N1 = 43
No death/disability N2 = 373
68.84 ± 10.03
63.34 ± 12.61
Time from onset, h
SBP on admission, mmHg
141.88 ± 25.96
143.40 ± 21.38
DBP on admission, mmHg
83.28 ± 16.99
84.13 ± 13.64
Diabetes mellitus, %
Coronary heart diseas, %
History of ischemic stroke, %
History of hemorrhagic stroke
Respiratory infection, %
Urinary tract infection, %
Electrolyte disturbance, %
Hemorrhage of digestive tract,%
The influence of etiologic subtype on outcomes at 3 month
Multivariate logistic analysis of the influence of cardioembolism on death/disability
1.003 ~ 1.073
.276 ~ 1.426
Time from onset
1.000 ~ 1.004
SBP on admission
.969 ~ 1.015
DBP on admission
.972 ~ 1.045
.610 ~ 2.826
.533 ~ 2.989
.317 ~ 4.448
Coronary heart diseas
.060 ~ 1.708
History of ischemic stroke
.025 ~ 2.070
History of hemorrhagic stroke
1.469 ~ 86.889
.208 ~ 1.848
.644 ~ 4.072
CE VS. Non-CE
1.257 ~ 9.170
1.527 ~ 7.596
Multivariate logistic analysis of the influence of SAO on death/disability
1.002 ~ 1.069
.270 ~ 1.398
Time from onset
.999 ~ 1.003
SBP on admission
.965 ~ 1.010
DBP on admission
.978 ~ 1.051
.659 ~ 3.095
.536 ~ 3.041
.301 ~ 4.124
Coronary heart diseas
.088 ~ 2.170
History of ischemic stroke
.029 ~ 2.425
History of hemorrhagic stroke
1.423 ~ 108.367
.209 ~ 1.886
.630 ~ 4.063
SAO VS. Non-SAO
.202 ~ .842
1.536 ~ 7.869
In this study, we found patients with mild stroke accounted for 41.1% in our cohort. The proportion of case fatality and death/disability was 2.2% and 10.1% respectively at 3 month. Different etiologic subtype can predict the outcome in these patients.
Previous studies showed the proportion of mild stroke veried from 5.8% to 62.3% based on different criteria, which in accordance with our study [16, 17]. Khatri et al. suggests that approximately one third of so-called mild strokes have significant disability (mRS 2–6) that persists at 3 months . In contrast, we found 10.1% of minor stroke had death or disability. The reasons of low proportion of our study may be as follows: (1) they used the NIHSS≦5 as criteria whereas we used NIHSS≦3, which indicates they included participants more severer than ours; (2) they measured disability with mRS > 1 whereas we defined it as mRS > 2; (3) they enrolled patients within 24 hours whereas we included them within 30 days, which means their participants may be prone to have early worsening or early recurrence than ours; (4) In general, the death or disability of acute ischemic stroke patients in China is lower than abroad [18, 19], so may be minor stroke no exception.
Several studies reported the predictors of poor outcome of mild stroke, such as age, diabetes, coronary heart disease, smoking, and vessel stenosis or occlusion were predictor of death or disability or recurrence at the end of follow up period [20–25]. Ferrari J et al. found hypertension, diabetes, cardiac decompensation, acute infection, and stroke etiology (LAA and CE) emerged as independent risk predictors for early deterioration in patients with a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke, defined by an NIHSS score <4 . In our cohort, age, history of intracerebral hemorrhage, infections and etiologic subtype (CE and SAO) were the independent predictors of death or disability at 3rd month. Our finding of etiologic subtype can predict outcome in mild stroke is more compelling, because consecutive subjects that were assessed beyond hospital discharge at 90 days. So far, although there are no identical variates for predicting the poor outcome of patients with minor stroke, future studies are needed to focus on how to really identify minor stroke patients with poor outcome by clinical features combined with imaging features. Recently, Strbian D et al. indicates that half of patients presenting with NIHSS 0–6 developed an infarction despite thrombolysis, and 40% had poor outcome. Perhaps, urgent multimodal imaging can help to identify mild stroke at risk of worsening . As we known, etiologic subtype help stratify patients for secondary prevention and it may also be used for identifing poor outcome in patients with mild stroke.
At present, whether patients presenting with mild stroke should or should not be treated with intravenous rtPA is still unclear. In our study, 3.8% (26/680) of cases admitted within 3 hours and 4.7% (32/680) admitted within 4.5 hours. However, no patient received intravenous thrombolysis. In the light of the natural history of course of mild stroke is not always benign, before a large randomized trial proving its lack of benefit in mild stroke patients, IV t-PA should be considered in these patients.
Our study has several limitations. (1) It was performed in a single-center, which may not represent for whole Chinese population; (2) there is no consensus definition of mild stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) rtPA study and the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III both excluded patients with mild stroke, but they failed to clearly define a certain threshold for a mild stroke. We used diagnostic criteria NIHSS score ≦3, which be evaluated as the more suitable cutoff point ; (3) The effects of potential unknown confounders cannot be ruled out in our cohort. Despite these limitations, our study explored the relationship between etiologic subtype and outcomes by inclusion of propectively consecutive patients and the blind evaluation of the study outcome.
In conclusion, our study indicates that different etiologic subtype can predict the outcome in patients with minor stroke it can help to stratify these patients for individual decision-making.
- IV rtPA:
Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
World Health Organization
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
Coronary heart disease
Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment
Small artery occlusion
Stroke of other determined cause
Stroke of undetermined cause
modified rankin scale
Transient ischaemic attack
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study.
Sources of funding
This research was supported by the Science and technology infrastructure projects of Sichuan Province (NO.2012JCPT008) and the Science & Technology Program of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (No. 2011SZ0202).
- Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The national institute of neurological disorders and stroke rt-PA stroke study group. N Engl J Med. 1995, 333 (24): 1581-1587.
- Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Davalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, et al: Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359 (13): 1317-1329. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804656.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barber PA, Zhang J, Demchuk AM, Hill MD, Buchan AM: Why are stroke patients excluded from TPA therapy? An analysis of patient eligibility. Neurology. 2001, 56 (8): 1015-1020. 10.1212/WNL.56.8.1015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kleindorfer D, Kissela B, Schneider A, Woo D, Khoury J, Miller R, Alwell K, Gebel J, Szaflarski J, Pancioli A, et al: Eligibility for recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischemic stroke: a population-based study. Stroke. 2004, 35 (2): e27-29. 10.1161/01.STR.0000109767.11426.17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohara T, Nagakane Y, Tanaka E, Morii F, Koizumi T, Yamamoto Y: Clinical and radiological features of stroke patients with poor outcomes Who Do Not receive intravenous thrombolysis because of mild symptoms. Eur Neurol. 2013, 69 (1): 4-7. 10.1159/000341339.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith EE, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, Cox M, Olson DM, Hernandez AF, Schwamm LH: Outcomes in mild or rapidly improving stroke not treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator: findings from Get with the guidelines-stroke. Stroke. 2011, 42 (11): 3110-3115. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khatri P, Conaway MR, Johnston KC: Ninety-day outcome rates of a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with mild ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012, 43 (2): 560-562. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nedeltchev K, Schwegler B, Haefeli T, Brekenfeld C, Gralla J, Fischer U, Arnold M, Remonda L, Schroth G, Mattle HP: Outcome of stroke with mild or rapidly improving symptoms. Stroke. 2007, 38 (9): 2531-2535. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coutts SB, Simon JE, Eliasziw M, Sohn CH, Hill MD, Barber PA, Palumbo V, Kennedy J, Roy J, Gagnon A, et al: Triaging transient ischemic attack and minor stroke patients using acute magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2005, 57 (6): 848-854. 10.1002/ana.20497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rajajee V, Kidwell C, Starkman S, Ovbiagele B, Alger JR, Villablanca P, Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Jahan R, Fredieu A, et al: Early MRI and outcomes of untreated patients with mild or improving ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2006, 67 (6): 980-984. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237520.88777.71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desilles JP, Cho TH, Hermier M, Mechtouff-Cimarelli L, Derex L, Nighoghossian N: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided thrombolysis in minor stroke. Int J Stroke. 2011, 6 (2): 178-10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00578.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stroke--1989: Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO task force on stroke and other cerebrovascular disorders. Stroke. 1989, 20 (10): 1407-1431.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fischer U, Baumgartner A, Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Gralla J, De Marchis GM, Kappeler L, Mono ML, Brekenfeld C, Schroth G: What is a minor stroke?. Stroke. 2010, 41 (4): 661-666. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.572883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993, 24 (1): 35-41. 10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J: Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988, 19 (5): 604-607. 10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Atanassova PA, Chalakova NT, Dimitrov BD: Major vascular events after transient ischaemic attack and minor ischaemic stroke: post hoc modelling of incidence dynamics. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008, 25 (3): 225-233. 10.1159/000113860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogata T, Yasaka M, Wakugawa Y, Ibayashi S, Okada Y: Predisposing factors for acute deterioration of minor ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2009, 287 (1–2): 147-150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- CAST: randomised placebo-controlled trial of early aspirin use in 20,000 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. CAST (Chinese acute stroke trial) collaborative group. Lancet. 1997, 349 (9066): 1641-1649. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)04010-5.
- Huang Y, Wang JG, Wei JW, Headley AP, Wong LK, Heeley EL, Arima H, Sun J, Li Q, Liu M: Age and gender variations in the management of ischaemic stroke in China. Int J Stroke. 2010, 5 (5): 351-359. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2010.00460.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prencipe M, Culasso F, Rasura M, Anzini A, Beccia M, Cao M, Giubilei F, Fieschi C: Long-term prognosis after a minor stroke: 10-year mortality and major stroke recurrence rates in a hospital-based cohort. Stroke. 1998, 29 (1): 126-132. 10.1161/01.STR.29.1.126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selvarajah JR, Smith CJ, Hulme S, Georgiou RF, Vail A, Tyrrell PJ: Prognosis in patients with transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke attending TIA services in the North West of England: the NORTHSTAR Study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008, 79 (1): 38-43. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.129163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Wijk I, Kappelle LJ, van Gijn J, Koudstaal PJ, Franke CL, Vermeulen M, Gorter JW, Algra A: Long-term survival and vascular event risk after transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: a cohort study. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9477): 2098-2104. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66734-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim JT, Kim HJ, Yoo SH, Park MS, Kwon SU, Cho KH, Kim JS, Kang DW: MRI findings may predict early neurologic deterioration in acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack due to intracranial atherosclerosis. Eur Neurol. 2010, 64 (2): 95-100. 10.1159/000315138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coutts SB, Hill MD, Campos CR, Choi YB, Subramaniam S, Kosior JC, Demchuk AM: Recurrent events in transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: what events are happening and to which patients?. Stroke. 2008, 39 (9): 2461-2466. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coutts SB, Modi J, Patel SK, Demchuk AM, Goyal M, Hill MD: CT/CT angiography and MRI findings predict recurrent stroke after transient ischemic attack and minor stroke: results of the prospective CATCH study. Stroke. 2012, 43 (4): 1013-1017. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.637421.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferrari J, Knoflach M, Kiechl S, Willeit J, Schnabl S, Seyfang L, Lang W: Early clinical worsening in patients with TIA or minor stroke: the Austrian stroke unit registry. Neurology. 2010, 74 (2): 136-141. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c9188b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strbian D, Piironen K, Meretoja A, Sairanen T, Putaala J, Tiainen M, Artto V, Rantanen K, Happola O, Kaste M: Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with mild symptoms. Int J Stroke. 2013, 8 (5): 293-299. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00808.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/13/154/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.