Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cystatin C, a novel indicator of renal function, reflects severity of cerebral microbleeds

  • Mi-Young Oh1,
  • Hyon Lee1,
  • Joon Soon Kim1,
  • Wi-Sun Ryu2,
  • Seung-Hoon Lee1,
  • Sang-Bae Ko1,
  • Chulho Kim3,
  • Chang Hun Kim1 and
  • Byung-Woo Yoon1Email author
BMC Neurology201414:127

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-127

Received: 22 July 2013

Accepted: 21 May 2014

Published: 12 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Chronic renal insufficiency, diagnosed using creatinine based estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or microalbumiuria, has been associated with the presence of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Cystatin C has been shown to be a more sensitive renal indicator than conventional renal markers. Under the assumption that similar pathologic mechanisms of the small vessel exist in the brain and kidney, we hypothesized that the levels of cystatin C may delineate the relationship between CMBs and renal insufficiency by detecting subclinical kidney dysfunction, which may be underestimated by other indicators, and thus reflect the severity of CMBs more accurately.

Methods

Data was prospectively collected for 683 patients with ischemic stroke. The severity of CMBs was categorized by the number of lesions. Patients were divided into quartiles of cystatin C, estimated GFR and microalbumin/creatinine ratios. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of each renal indicator with CMBs.

Results

In models including both quartiles of cystatin C and estimated GFR, only cystatin C quartiles were significant (the highest vs. the lowest, adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI 1.05-3.38; p = 0.03) in contrast to estimated GFR (the highest vs. the lowest, adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI 0.38-4.36; p = 0.70). A model including both quartiles of cystatin C and microalbumin/creatinine ratio also showed that only cystatin C quartiles was associated with CMBs (the highest vs. the lowest, adjusted OR, 2.06; 95% CI 1.07-3.94; p = 0.03). These associations were also observed in the logistic models using log transformed-cystatin C, albumin/creatinine ratio and estimated GFR as continuous variables. Cystatin C was a significant indicator of deep or infratenorial CMBs, but not strictly lobar CMBs. In addition, cystatin C showed the greatest significance in c-statistics for the presence of CMBs (AUC = 0.73 ± 0.03; 95% CI 0.66-0.76; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Cystatin C may be the most sensitive indicator of CMB severity among the renal disease markers.

Keywords

Cystatin C Estimated glomerular filtration rate Microalbuminuria Cerebral microbleeds

Background

Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are discrete or isolated, punctate, hypo-intense lesions, smaller than 5 mm on T2- weighted MRI [1, 2]. They are clinically silent but are strongly associated with advanced microvascular ischemic disease and are a marker for increased risk of future intracranial hemorrhagic events [3, 4]. CMBs are a reflection of generalized microangiopathy in cerebral small vessel disease [5, 6]. Small vessel disease in the brain and kidneys are closely related through anatomical and vasoregulatory similarities, including high perfusion pressure, low vascular resistance and the critical role of nitric oxide in maintaining the microcirculation of the glomerulus or cerebral perforating arterioles [7]. Recent studies also reported that a close relationship exists between renal dysfunction and the presence of CMBs in stroke patients [8, 9]. With this context in mind, an appropriate indicator may exist that reflects the severity of the small vessel pathologies of both the brain and the kidneys. Most of the previous studies defined renal insufficiency based on the conventional, creatinine-based renal indicators, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) or microalbuminuria [10, 11]. Cystatin C, a cysteine proteinase inhibitor, has been proposed to be an alternative marker for renal function. It is abundant in the serum and less dependent on extra renal factors compared to creatinine [12, 13]. It also has a greater sensitivity for revealing mild renal dysfunction even in presumably healthy individuals compared to conventional renal indicators [14, 15]. In addition, cystatin C levels have been shown to correlate with silent cerebral infarctions and white matter lesions [16, 17]. However the association between the cystatin C and CMB severity has not been reported. We examined whether cystatin C is more strongly associated with CMBs than the estimated GFR or microalbumin/creatinine ratio.

Methods

Patients

Data was prospectively collected for 714 consecutive Korean patients who were admitted to a tertiary medical center with an ischemic stroke within 7 days of onset between January 2008 and May 2011. The enrolled population was ethnically homogeneous. We excluded patients whose GRE MR images were not suitable for evaluating CMBs as a result of motion or susceptibility artifacts (n = 31). A total of 683 patients were included for analysis. This study was approved by Seoul National University Hospital institutional review board.

Laboratory and clinical information

Serum cystatin C was measured from blood samples drawn upon admission with the use of a BN II nephelometer (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc) with a particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay (N Latex cystatin C, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc) [18]. Serum creatinine was measured by the rate Jaffe method [19]. The intra-individual coefficient of variation was approximately 2%. The estimated GFR was calculated by the abbreviated (4-variable) Modification of Diet and Renal Disease Study formula as follows: for creatinine in umol/L, estimated GFR = (serum creatinine/88.4)–1.154 x (age–0.203) x (0.742, if female) [20]. The urine microalbumin/creatinine ratio was measured by a single spot sample at admission using nephelometry and was reported as micrograms of albumin per milligram creatinine [21]. All patients had serum panels including hemoglobin A1c, lipid parameters, and hemoglobin drawn early in the morning after fasting overnight. We collected baseline demographic and clinical information for all study participants, including age, sex, use of antithrombotic or anticoagulant medication and presence of cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension (determined by the previous use of antihypertensive medication, a systolic blood pressure > 140 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg at discharge), diabetes (determined by the previous use of antidiabetic medication, a fasting blood glucose > 7.0 mmol/L or a postprandial blood glucose after 2 hours >11.1 mmol/L at discharge), dyslipidemia (determined by the previous use of lipid-lowering medication or a total cholesterol > 6.2 mmol/L), heart disease (defined as patients with previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy), and previous stroke. We classified the stroke mechanism of the patients based on the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria [22].

Imaging information

MRI was performed using a 1.5 T superconducting magnet system (GE Medical System, Milwaukee, WI). Gradient Echo (GRE) T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed as part of a routine protocol, and the images were obtained in the axial plane with the following parameters: repetition time/echo time = 500/15 msec; flip angle = 26°; matrix size = 256 _ 192; slice thickness = 6 mm; and gap width = 2 mm. Standard T2-weighted and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were also obtained. CMBs were defined as a well-defined focal area of low signal on the GRE MRI less than 10 mm in diameter, and they were counted throughout the whole brain by the two trained neurologists. All GRE scans of every patient were performed upon diagnosis of the ischemic stroke and were examined twice for intra-rater variability (k = 0.93, p < 0.01). The interval duration was four weeks. The CMB grades of two raters were compared to each other to determine inter-rater variability (k = 0.95, p < 0.01) [23]. CMB mimicking lesions (e.g. vessels, mineralization, air-bone interfaces and partial volume artifacts at the edges of the cerebellum) were excluded. The lesions were stratified by location: the corticosubcortical area (cortex, subcortex and white matter), deep gray mater (basal ganglia and thalamus) and infratentorial area (brain stem and cerebellum) [24]. We divided the CMBs into strictly lobar and deep or infratentorial (with or without lobar CMBs) groups according to location. Persons who had more than one CMB restricted to the lobar location were classified as “strictly lobar CMBs” patients. CMBs in a deep or infratentorial location with or without lobar CMBs were classified as “deep or infratentorial CMBs” [25]. We graded the severity of the CMBs based on the total number of CMBs: normal = no CMBs; mild = 1 to 4; moderate = 5 to 9; and severe 10 [24]. White matter lesions seen on T2*-weighted or FLAIR images were defined according to the criteria of Fazekas et al.: normal, being absent of white matter lesions; punctuate, showing multiple periventricular hyperintense punctate lesions; early confluent, showing early confluence of lesion foci; and confluent, showing confluence of multiple areas [26].

Statistical analysis

The distributions of demographic, clinical, laboratory and stroke data according to cystatin C levels were determined using the chi-square test for trends in proportion or by one-way analysis of variance with the Bonferroni method for post hoc analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate. We used the chi square test for trend to compare the distributions of grades of CMBs according to the quartiles of cystatin C. Multi-colinearity between the variables were assessed by the Pearson correlation analysis (cystatin C and estimated GFR, r = 0.43, p < 0.01; cystatin C and microalbumin/creatinine ratio, r = 0.23, p < 0.01; cystatin C and creatinine, r = 0.52, p < 0.01; estimated GFR and microalbumin/creatinine, r = 0.81, p < 0.01).

To examine the association between CMB grades and cystatin C according to groups with lacunar or non lacunar stroke, we conducted partial correlation analyses, adjusted for age and sex. We compared each correlation coeffient using Fisher’s Z transformation. Proportional odds models for logistic regression analyses were performed on the quartiles of cystain C, microalbumin/creatinine ratio and estimated GFR. First, the logistic model was conducted using the quartiles of cystatin C, estimated GFR or microalbumin/creatinine ratio separately. The second model included two of the three indicators. Among the three renal indicators, the multicolinearlity of the estimated GFR and the microalbumin/creatine ratio was 0.81, more than 0.67 which may lead to spurious results in logistic regression analysis [27]. Thus, we analyzed the estimated GFR and microalbumin/creatine using the individual logistic regression analysis with cystatin C. The third ordinal logistic regression analyses were also performed on the standard deviation of the log-transformed values of cystatin C or estimated GFR and microalbumin/creatinine ratio. We also conducted the fourth ordinal logistic regression analyses according to the location of CMBs (strictly vs. deep or infratenrorial CMBs).

These logistic models were adjusted for clinical confounders including age, gender, total cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous heart disease, smoking, previous anti thrombotic or anticoagulant use, and white matter lesions. The proportional odds assumption was assessed by the parallel line test. Significance was set at a 2-tailed p < 0.05 level. We assessed the improvement in discrimination by comparing the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) in models with and without each renal indicator. The ROC curve was generated to compare the relationship between each renal indicator and the presence of CMBs using multivariable logistic regression that included variables of age, gender, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking, total cholesterol, anti thrombotic or anticoagulant use, and white matter lesion volume with or without cystatin C, microalbumiuria, and estimated GFR. We presented the values in frequencies (percentages), means ± SDs, or medians (interquartile ranges (IQR)) as appropriate. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0.1(SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) and STATA version 7.0 (STATA Corp, College Station, Tex).

Results

Baseline characteristics

Among a total of 683 stroke patients, 443 (63.4%) were male. The average age was 66.6 ± 12.3 years (range of 21 to 96 years). The number of patients with small vessel occlusions was 145 (21.2%), and the number of patients with large artery thrombosis was 196 (28.7%). Cardioembolism was determined as the cause of stroke in 136 (19.9%) patients, 96 (14.1%) patients were classified as having a stroke of other determined etiology according to the TOAST classification, and 110 (16.1%) patients had a stroke of unknown etiology. Three hundred and forty-three patients had hypertension (50.2%), 181 patients (26.5%) had diabetes, 200 patients (29.3%) had dyslipidemia, and 151 patients (22.1%) had a history of heart disease. Eighty eight patients were taking Aspirin (ATC classification, B01AC06). Eight patients were prescribed other anti platelet medications including clopidogrel (B01AC04), ticlopidine (B01AC05), and cilostazole (B01AC23). Thirty-four patients were on warfarin (BO1AA03).

The cystatin C concentrations ranged from 27.0 to 603.7 nmol/L (median = 54.7, inter quartile range [IQR] = 47.2 to 66.7). The estimated GFR ranged from 3.5 to 249.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 (mean ± SD = 80.5 ± 26.0). The albumin/creatinine ratio was from 3.0 to 190.7 μg/mg (median = 24.0; IQR = 11.0, 100.75). The subjects with higher grades of CMBs were more likely to have a previous history of stroke, higher cystatin C levels and more confluent white matter lesions. Initial NIHSS scores or history of antithrombotic medication use were not different among the groups (Table 1). Fifty-four patients were labeled as “strictly lobar CMBs” patients, and 135 patients were classified as the “deep or infratentorial CMBs” group.
Table 1

Baseline profiles

Variables

Grade

 

Normal

Mild

Moderate

Severe

P

No. of CMBs

0

1-4

5-9

10

 

No. of Cases, n (%)

494(72.3)

141(20.6)

24(3.5)

24(3.5)

 

Demographic data

     

Age, mean ± SD

65.7 ± 12.4

69.1 ± 10.9

67.2 ± 13.8

66.6 ± 12.2

0.02

Male, n (%)

311(63.0)

90(63.8)

15(62.5)

17(70.8)

0.89**

Risk factors, n (%)

     

Hypertension

229(46.4)

85(60.3)

14(58.3)

15(62.5)

0.01**

Diabetes

125(25.3)

46(32.6)

4(16.7)

6(25.0)

0.23**

Dyslipidemia

152(30.8)

40(28.4)

5(20.8)

3(12.5)

0.20**

Smoking

181(36.6)

43(30.5)

3(12.5)

5(20.8)

0.08**

History of heart disease

105(21.3)

37(26.2)

4(16.7)

5(20.8)

0.56**

History of previous stroke

83(16.8)

39(27.7)

9(37.5)

8(33.3)

<0.01**

Initial NIHSS* score

3[1,7]

3[1,5]

4[2,6]

3[1,5]

0.63

Stroke information, n (%)

     

Small vessel occlusion

88(17.8)

37(26.2)

11(45.8)

9(37.5)

<0.02

Large artery thrombosis

153(31.0)

35(24.8)

3(12.5)

5(20.8)

 

Cardio embolism

87(19.6)

33(23.4)

3(12.5)

3(12.5)

 

Cryptogenic

79(16.0)

21(14.9)

5(20.8)

5(20.8)

 

Other etiology

79(15.6)

15(10.6)

2(8.3)

2(8.3)

 

Laboratory data

     

Hemoglobin (g/dL)

13.6 ± 2.0

13.3 ± 2.0

13.8 ± 2.1

18.6 ± 5.1

<0.01

Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)

4.5 ± 1.1

4.3 ± 1.1

4.6 ± 0.8

4.6 ± 0.7

0.24

White blood cell count (106/μL)

7.8 ± 2.8

7.7 ± 3.0

7.3 ± 2.0

6.8 ± 2.1

0.28

Cystatin C,

53.9

60.7

61.0

64.7

0.01

median[IQR] (nmol/L)

[46.4,63.7]

[47.9,74.9]

[51.9,68.9]

[54.9,82.2]

Creatinine (μmol/L)

99.3 ± 69.1

114.5 ± 83.7

92.3 ± 20.3

148.0 ± 52.9

0.01

Estimated GFR*,

82.2 ± 25.7

74.1 ± 26.4

80.8 ± 26.5

75.2 ± 25.4

<0.01

mean ± SD (ml/min/1.73 m2)

Microalbumin/Creatinine,

0.02

0.03

0.01

0.03

0.21

median[IQR] (μg/mg)

[0.01,0.08]

[0.01,0.18]

[0.01,0.10]

[0.01,0.20]

 

Severity of WML*, n (%)

     

Normal

207(42.2)

33(23.6)

1(4.2)

0(0)

<0.01**

Punctate

131(26.7)

34(24.3)

1(4.2)

0(0)

 

Early confluent

46(9.4)

21(15.0)

3(12.5)

2(8.3)

 

Confluent

107(21.8)

52(37.1)

19(79.2)

22(11.0)

 

Anti thrombotics, n (%)

57(11.5)

28(19.9)

6(25.0)

5(20.8)

0.91**

Aspirin

49(9.9)

28(19.9)

6(25.0)

5920.8)

 

Other anti thrombotics

8(1.6)

0

0

0

 

Anticoagulant, warfarin, n (%)

18(3.6)

11(7.8)

3(12.5)

2(8.3)

0.31**

*NIHSS; National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, GFR;glomerular filtration rate, WML; white matter lesions.

p-values were calculated by the Chi-square test**, one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni methodand Kruskal-Wallis test.

Interestingly, the association between the CMB grades and cystatin C in the patients with lacunar stroke showed a stronger correlation than that in the patients with non lacunar stroke. (r = 0.26 at p < 0.01 vs. r = 0.09 at p < 0.05; Z score = 1.72 at p = 0.04).

The association between cystatin C, estimated GFR and CMBs

Patients were divided into four groups based on the quartile values of serum cystatin C (Q1 < 47.2, Q2 = 47.2-54.7, Q3 = 54.7-66.7, and Q4 > 66.7 nmol/L), or the quartiles of estimated GFR (Q4 > 66.1, Q3 = 66.1-78.8, Q2 = 78.8-94.7, and Q1 > 94.7 ml/min/1.73 m2). The proportion of patients with a moderate to severe number of CMBs gradually increased as the cystatin C levels increased (p for trend <0.01).

Estimated GFR and cystatin C levels were associated with CMBs using an independent logistic model. Compared to patients with the lowest levels of cystatin C, patients with high cystatin C had a more significant association with the presence of CMBs. After adjusting for confounders, the cystatin C levels (adjusted OR, 1.90) remained significant in individual models. The estimated GFR analysis failed to show significance (adjusted OR 1.82). In a second model including both estimated GFR and cystatin C levels, cystatin C was independently associated with an increased risk of CMBs. Those with the highest cystatin C levels had a 1.88 fold higher risk of severe CMBs (95% confidential interval [CI], 1.05-3.38; p = 0.03). The estimated GFR failed to show a significant association with CMB severity (adjusted OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.38-4.36; p = 0.70). Age, hypertension, smoking history and white matter lesion volume showed a significant association with CMB severity after adjusting for confounders (Table 2). After using clinical categories of estimated GFR based on chronic kidney disease stage, only cystatin C remained significantly associated with the CMBs (see Additional file 1). These results were reproduced (see Additional file 2) after excluding patients with renal failure (n = 13). Further, we conducted analyses using the newly developed estimated GFR equation based on both creatinine and cystatin C, and found that the estimated GFR using cystatin C or based on both creatinine and cystatin C were better predictors of CMB severity than the estimated GFR based creatinine alone. (see Additional file 3) [28].
Table 2

Ordinal logistic regression analysis for the association of renal indicators and cerebral microbleeds

     

Model1

  

Model2

     

Variables

N

Unadjusted OR

95% CI

P

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Age

 

1.02

1.01-1.04

<0.01

1.02

1.02-1.04

<0.01

1.01

1.00-1.03

0.07

1.02

1.01-1.04

0.02

Male

 

1.08

0.65-1.31

0.66

1.36

0.73-1.36

0.76

1.36

0.91-2.03

0.13

1.31

0.87-1.31

0.20

Hypertension

 

1.74

1.24-2.44

<0.01

1.43

1.05-2.18

0.03

1.51

1.05-2.19

0.03

1.53

1.06-2.23

0.02

Diabetes

 

1.19

0.82-1.72

0.36

0.85

0.57-1.28

0.45

1.23

0.74-1.68

0.59

1.18

0.78-1.78

0.44

Dyslipidemia

 

1.35

0.51-1.08

0.12

0.68

0.45-1.02

0.06

1.22

1.00-2.19

0.05

1.49

1.00-2.22

0.05

Heart disease

 

1.15

0.70-1.70

0.48

1.05

0.66-1.66

0.82

1.05

0.70-1.60

0.80

1.00

0.65-1.52

1.00

Smoking

 

1.62

1.12-2.34

0.01

1.35

0.86-2.13

0.05

1.91

1.25-2.92

<0.01

1.52

1.01-2.28

<0.01

Anticoagulant or thrombotics

 

2.26

1.53-2,26

<0.01

1.72

1.08-2.72

0.02

1.51

1.00-2.29

0.05

1.48

0.98-2.25

0.07

Total cholesterol

 

1.07

0.91-1.26

0.42

1.01

0.81-1.01

0.43

1.01

0.85-1.21

0.89

1.03

0.87-1.23

0.72

WML*

             

Confluent

 

6.24

3.96-9.83

<0.01

4.08

2.37-7.02

<0.01

4.82

2.98-7.80

<0.01

4.56

2.80-7.41

<0.01

Early confluent

 

3.92

2.47-6.22

<0.01

2.66

1.60-4.41

<0.01

2.72

1.74-4.25

<0.01

2.62

1.67-4.12

<0.01

Puctate

 

1.82

1.06-3.14

0.03

1.31

0.72-2.39

0.38

1.57

0.91-2.70

0.11

1.45

0.83-2.51

0.19

Normal

 

ref

  

ref

     

ref

  

p for trend

   

<0.01

  

<0.01

     

<0.01

Quartiles of cystatin C

             

 Q4(≥66.7)

168

2.19

1.40-3.40

<0.01

1.90

1.07-3.37

0.02

   

1.88

1.05-3.38

0.03

 Q3(54.7-66.7)

173

1.57

0.92-2.46

0.10

1.31

0.45-1.28

0.35

   

1.24

0.74-2.08

0.42

 Q2(47.2-54.7)

162

0.98

0.61-1.58

0.16

1.54

0.85-2.80

0.16

   

0.83

0.49-1.41

0.49

 Q1(≤47.2), ref

180

            

p for trend

   

<0.01

  

<0.01

     

<0.01

Quartiles of eGFR*

             

 Q4(≤66.1)

171

2.26

1.42-3.62

<0.01

   

1.82

0.38-4.00

0.72

1.28

0.38-4.36

0.70

 Q3(66.1-78.8)

175

1.23

0.50-1.33

0.41

   

1.44

0.95-3.99

0.67

0.78

0.35-1.70

0.93

 Q2(78.8-94.7)

164

1.18

0.50-1.40

0.51

   

1.33

0.70-2.11

0.50

1.11

0.61-2.03

1.11

 Q1(≥94.7),ref

173

            

p for trend

   

<0.01

     

<0.01

  

0.51

*WML; white matter lesions, eGFR; estimated glomerular filtration rate.

†Model 1: quartiles of estimated GFR and cystatin C were analyzed separately in the individual ordinal logistic regression model.

‡Model 2: quartiles of estimated GFR and cystatin C were analyzed together in the same logistic regression model.

Model 1 and model 2 were adjusted for covariates; age, sex, total cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous heart disease, smoking, previous anti thrombotic or anticoagulant use, and white matter lesions.

The association between cystatin C, microalbuminuria and CMBs

We also used additional multivariable models to examine the association between cystatin C, microalbumin/creatinine ratio and CMBs. Crude and adjusted ORs for the severity of CMBs are presented in Table 3. The higher quartiles of microalbuminuria were not associated with CMBs, as compared to the lowest quartile. The crude ORs of the microalbumin/creatinine ratios showed an increasing, but statistically insignificant trend (ORs of Q4, Q3, Q2, 1.34, 1.28, 0.86, respectively; p for trend = 0.20). After adjusting for other variables, cystatin C (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.07-3.94; p = 0.03) remained as an independent predictor of the severity of CMBs, in contrast to microalbumiuria levels (OR, 1.34, 95% CI, 0.71-1.43, p = 0.36).
Table 3

Ordinal logistic regression analysis for the association of renal indicators and cerebral microbleeds

     

Model1

  

Model2

     

Variables

N

Unadjusted OR

95% CI

P

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Age, per year

 

1.02

1.01-1.04

<0.01

1.02

1.02-1.04

<0.01

1.02

1.00-1.04

0.06

1.01

1.01-1.05

0.01

Male

 

1.08

0.65-1.31

0.66

1.36

0.73-1.36

0.76

1.39

0.87-2.22

0.17

1.31

0.86-2.12

0.27

Hypertension

 

1.74

1.24-2.44

<0.01

1.43

1.05-2.18

0.03

1.77

1.14-2.78

<0.01

1.83

1.17-2.86

<0.01

Diabetes

 

1.19

0.82-1.72

0.36

0.85

0.57-1.28

0.45

1.04

0.64-1.68

0.88

1.10

0.68-1.79

0.70

Dyslipidemia

 

1.35

0.51-1.08

0.12

0.68

0.45-1.02

0.06

1.72

1.08-2.73

0.02

1.76

1.10-2.82

0.02

Heart disease

 

1.15

0.70-1.70

0.48

1.05

0.66-1.66

0.82

1.03

0.63-1.67

0.91

1.06

0.65-1.74

0.81

Smoking

 

1.62

1.12-2.34

0.01

1.35

0.86-2.13

0.05

1.22

0.76-1.96

0.41

1.26

0.78-2.04

0.35

Anticoagulant or thrombotics

 

2.26

1.53-2,26

<0.01

1.72

1.08-2.72

0.02

1.67

1.01-2.76

0.05

1.63

0.98-2.70

0.26

Total cholesterol, per mmol/L

 

1.07

0.91-1.26

0.42

1.01

0.81-1.01

0.43

1.01

0.83-1.23

0.93

1.05

0.86-1.28

0.27

WML*

             

Confluent

 

6.24

3.96-9.83

<0.01

4.08

2.37-7.02

<0.01

4.87

2.78-8.52

<0.01

4.56

2.59-8.03

<0.01

Early confluent

 

3.92

2.47-6.22

<0.01

2.66

1.60-4.41

<0.01

2.67

1.57-4.53

<0.01

2.54

1.49-4.34

<0.01

Puctate

 

1.82

1.06-3.14

0.03

1.31

0.72-2.39

0.38

1.60

0.85-3.01

0.15

.1.49

0.79-2.83

0.22

Normal,ref

             

p for trend

   

<0.01

     

<0.01

  

<0.01

Quartiles of cystatin C

             

Q4(≥66.7)

168

2.19

1.40-3.40

<0.01

1.90

1.07-3.37

0.02

   

2.06

1.07-3.94

0.03

Q3(54.7-66.7)

173

1.57

0.92-2.46

0.10

1.31

0.45-1.28

0.35

   

2.20

1.18-4.09

0.01

Q2(47.2-54.7)

162

0.98

0.61-1.58

0.16

1.54

0.85-2.80

0.16

   

1.36

0.78-2.36

0.27

Q1(≤47.2), ref

180

            

p for trend

   

<0.01

  

<0.01

     

<0.01

Quartiles of Alb/Cr*,

             

Q4(≥100.8)

160

1.52

0.87-2.66

0.14

   

1.61

0.88-2.95

0.13

1.34

0.71-1.43

0.36

Q3(24.0-.100.8)

136

1.20

0.70-2.06

0.51

   

1.32

0.75-2.29

0.33

1.28

0.73-1.48

0.38

Q2(11.0-24.0)

217

0.97

0.52-1.80

0.91

   

1.09

0.59-2.03

0.78

0.86

0.53-1.61

0.76

Q1(≤11.0),ref

170

            

p for trend

   

0.10

     

0.16

  

0.20

*WML;white matter lesions, Alb/Cr; albumin/creatinine ratio.

†Model 1: quartiles of microalbumin/creatinine and cystatin C were analyzed separately in the individual ordinal logistic regression model.

‡Model 2: quartiles of microalbumin/creatinine and cystatin C were analyzed together in the same logistic regression model.

Model 1 and model 2 were adjusted for covariates; age, sex, total cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous heart disease, smoking, previous anti thrombotic or anticoagulant use, and white matter lesions.

In Table 4, log transformed cystatin C levels showed an association with CMBs, but other renal indicators did not. These analyses were repeated (see Additional file 4) excluding the patients with renal failure (n = 13).
Table 4

logistic regression analysis for the association of renal indicators and cerebral microbleeds

    

Model 1

  

Model 2

     

Variables

Unadjusted OR

95% CI

p

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p

Adjusted OR

 

p

Log-Cystatin C, per SD*

1.37

1.18-1.59

<0.01

1.30

1.05-1.69

0.02

1.27

1.04-1.61

0.02

1.73

1.82-3.08

<0.01

Log-albumin/Creatinine, per SD

0.90

0.81-1.01

0.08

0.90

0.82-1.03

0.93

   

1.00

0.87-1.14

0.96

Estimated GFR*, per SD

1.01

0.64-0.91

<0.01

1.01

0.82-1.30

0.80

1.01

0.80-1.27

0.86

   

*SD; standard deviation, GFR; glomerular filtration rate.

Model 1: Estimated GFR and log transformed cystatin C, and microalbumin/creatinine ratios were analyzed separately in an individual ordinal logistic model.

Model 2: the first ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed using log transformed value of cystatin C and estimated GFR together. The second model used log transformed values of cystatin C and microalbumin/creatinine ratios as variables. All models were adjusted for covariates: age, sex, total cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous heart disease, smoking, previous anti thrombotic or anticoagulant use, and white matter lesions.

The association between cystatin C and the location of CMBs

When we divided the CMB patients into strictly lobar and deep or infratentorial (with or without lobar CMBs) groups, the association between cystatin C quartiles and CMBs was significant for the deep or infratentorial CMB group but not for the strictly lobar CMB group (Table 5). The adjusted OR of the fourth quartile of cystatin C for the deep of infratentorial CMB grades was 6.67 (95% CI, 1.48–2.64; p = 0.01). In addition, only cystatin C remained a significant indicator of CMBs grade in the deep or infratentorial CMB group among the three indicators (see Additional file 5 and Additional file 6).
Table 5

Ordinal logistic regression analyses according to the location of CMBs

Variables

N

Unadjusted OR

95% CI

P

Adjusted OR

95% CI

P

Strictly lobar CMBs

54

      

 Quartiles of cystatin C

       

 Q4(≥66.7)

23

6.14

0.01-1.78

0.13

5.23

0.30-8.98

0.13

 Q3(54.7-66.7)

14

4.84

0.01-3.80

0.29

2.82

0.46-1.69

0.11

 Q2(47.2-54.7)

5

1.54

0.03-11.2

0.76

1.37

0.05-3.77

0.85

 Q1(≤47.2), ref

12

      

p for trend

   

0.10

  

0.50

Deep or infratentorial CMBs

135

      

 Quartiles of cystatin C

       

 Q4(≥66.7)

45

5.00

1.30-1.91

0.02

6.27

1.48-2.64

0.01

 Q3(54.7-66.7)

39

1.50

0.51-4.34

0.46

2.48

0.76-8.02

0.13

 Q2(47.2-54.7)

23

1.00

0.40-2.28

0.93

1.10

0.43-2.78

0.83

 Q1(≤47.2),ref

28

      

p for trend

   

0.02

  

0.02

Adjusted for the covariates: age, sex, total cholesterol, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous heart disease, smoking, previous anti thrombotic or anticoagulant use and white matter lesions.

The predictive value of cystatin C, microalbuminuria, and estimated GFR for CMBs

The AUC of the logistic regression model calculated without any renal indicators was 0.66 ± 0.03 (95% CI, 0.59-0.70; p = 0.02). The addition of cystatin C increased the AUC (0.73 ± 0.03; 95% CI, 0.66-0.76; p = 0.02; difference = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.12; p < 0.01).

In contrast, adding the estimated GFR (0.68 ± 0.02; 95% CI, 0.57-0.69; p = 0.02) or microalbumiuria (0.62 ± 0.03; 95% CI, 0.56-0.64; p = 0.02) did not show a profound incremental change compared to the model without the indicators. The AUC of the logistic regression model including all the indicators did not show a difference between that of the model adding the cystatin C alone (difference < 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; p = 0.86). Taken together, the levels of cystatin C appear to have the greatest discriminating power among the three indictors (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2377-14-127/MediaObjects/12883_2013_Article_1050_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The predictive value of each renal indicator for the presence of CMBs.

Discussion

We found that higher cystatin C concentrations showed a greater association with severe CMB pathology especially in patients of the highest quartile. One standard deviation increase in the log-transformation of cystatin C levels also showed a closer relationship with severe CMBs. The estimated GFR and microalbumin/creatinine ratio failed to show a significant association with the number of CMBs. Moreover, the association was sustained in patients with deep or infratentorial CMBs but not among those with strictly lobar CMBs. In addition, the correlation between the CMB grades and cystatin C in patients with lacunar stroke showed a stronger association than that in patients with non lacunar stroke. Cystatin C was the most powerful indicator for CMBs among the three renal markers. Our results corroborate previous studies showing that renal dysfunction is independently associated with CMBs [8, 29]. Furthermore, we showed that cystatin C may reflect the severity of CMBs in a dose dependent manner more accurately than other renal indicators.

Cystatin C concentration is less affected by extrarenal factors compared to creatinine [12]. It has been used as a predictor of coronary heart disease, heart failure, and all causes of mortality in various populations by the detection of subclinical renal insufficiency [3032]. Its prognostic value for adverse outcomes was independent of conventional renal parameters [3133]. In studies of small arteriopathies, cystatin C also showed a strong association with white mater lesions or silent brain infarctions compared to estimated GFR [16, 17]. Our results seem to support the finding of these previous studies.

White matter lesions were significantly associated with CMBs in this study. Recent studies suggested CMBs may be one of pathologic continuum with white matter lesions and lacunar infarcts [34]. Spontaneous hypertensive rat model reported that the initial early, silent damage to the blood brain barrier initiates a pathological cascade-via microbleeds- that leads to the formation of obstructive thrombi, which cause white matter lesions or lacunar infarcts [35]. In this context, all these lesions might be based on the fragility of vasculature irrespective of their different radiologic findings [36].

In addition, hypertension was significantly associated with the severity of CMBs. Large prospective cohort studies have also reported that hypertension is a risk factor for CMBs [25]. In particular, CMBs in the corticosubcortical junction or infratentorial lesions result from hypertensive or atherosclerotic microangiopathy. Hypertensive burden strongly affect the microvasculature of both the brain and kidneys [37]. In support of this, modulators of the renin angiotensin system have been shown to be effective in preventing proteinuria and also the aggravation of cerebral small vessel disease [38, 39]. Optimal blood pressure control is regarded as the foremost determinant of cerebrovascular and renal protection [40].

The estimated GFR failed to show an association after adjusting for the white matter lesions. The white matter lesion volume may play a role as a potent confounder for CMBs in this study [41]. Microalbuminuria was not associated with CMBs in our results. A previous study reported that patients with a proteinuria grade of one or more had at least a twofold increased risk of having CMBs compared to patients with trace proteinuria or none at all [29]. This difference might be explained by age and different ethnicities which may affect the urine albumin concentrations. Our group was relatively younger than those of the previous study, and different levels of albumin secretion according to ethnicity may have contributed to the small proportion of patients with overt proteinuria [42].

The association between cystatin C levels and CMBs could be understood by the manifestation of microvascular damage of two end organs, the brain and the kidneys. Both vascular beds are exposed to high pulsatile pressure on account of upstream vasodilation. They are passively perfused at a high flow rate throughout systolic and diastolic periods, and by contrast, their smallest arteries have low resistance [7, 19, 37]. Thus, they are exposed to high shear stress, and are susceptible to hypertensive insults and variations in blood pressure [43]. CMBs are indicators of previous occurrences of blood extravasation from advanced fibro-hyalinized arterioles. Chronic kidney disease is also characterized by glomerular endothelial dysfunction affected by lipohyalinosis [44, 45]. In addition, nitric oxide plays an important role in the proliferation of smooth muscle and maintenance of constant blood flow. Decreased nitric oxide levels in the degenerated endothelium of microangiopathic vessels was found to increase pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic properties, and eventually lead to a loss of blood flow auto-regulation [46]. Finally, sodium retention, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, and elevated catecholamine levels lead to increased blood pressure [47]. These effects might partially contribute to the occurrence of CMBs in renal insufficiency. Considering the similar pathomechanisms in small vessel diseases of the brain and kidney, cystatin C, a more reliable marker of renal function, might represent the degree of severity of CMBs more accurately [17].

Growing evidence suggested that CMBs are an indicator of a bleeding prone brain. CMBs are closely associated with the occurrence and outcome of hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis in ischemic stroke [48]. Their location and numbers are potent predictors for the outcome of spontaneous or antithrombotic related intracranial hemorrhages [3, 49]. The association between renal indicators and CMBs may explain in part why these trends were more profound in patients with chronic kidney disease [50].

There are some caveats to this study. First, this is a cross-sectional study and no causal relationship between CMBs and cystatin C can be evaluated. Second, cystatin C levels were not measured repeatedly. An acute phase reaction accompanying stroke or the stroke severity may influence the levels of cystatin C, though information about the changes in cystatin C levels after acute cardiovascular events has not been reported. Third, this study was conducted in patients with stroke. The included parties probably had greater co-morbidities, e.g. diabetes and hypertension, which are also risk factors for CMBs, than a community based population; thus, they were likely to have more CMBs than a healthy population. These results should be confirmed in a healthy population with various ethnicities. Fourth, we used GRE scans at diagnosis of stroke. The presence of CMBs might be affected by the ischemic stroke [51]. However, the rapid appearance of CMBs after stroke was only related to the baseline number of CMBs and white matter lesion volumes. Thus, this bias had little impact on our results. Fifth, we were unable to obtain a history of the previous use of cardiovascular medication in some patients meticulously. This might be one confounder in our study as a recent study has reported the association between these medications and CMBs [52].

Conclusions

Our results showed that cystatin C may be a more sensitive indicator to detect the severity of CMBs compared to the estimated GFR or microalbumin/creatinine ratio in patients with ischemic stroke. CMBs strongly correlated with the occurrence and clinical outcome of intracranial hemorrhages. Given its association with the severity of CMBs, cystatin C levels could help stratify the risk for intracranial hemorrhage more accurately. Further studies are needed to clarify this issue.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Kaste (Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland) who gave the advice to revise the manuscript.

This study was supported by the Korea Healthcare Technology R & D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI10C2020).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital
(2)
Department of Neurology, Dogguk University Ilsan Hospital
(3)
Department of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine

References

  1. Cordonnier C, Al-Shahi Salman R, Wardlaw J: Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting. Brain. 2007, 130 (Pt 8): 1988-2003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Wielopolski PA, Krestin GP, Breteler MM, van der Lugt A: Cerebral microbleeds: accelerated 3D T2*-weighted GRE MR imaging versus conventional 2D T2*-weighted GRE MR imaging for detection. Radiology. 2008, 248 (1): 272-277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lovelock CE, Cordonnier C, Naka H, Al-Shahi Salman R, Sudlow CL, Sorimachi T, Werring DJ, Gregoire SM, Imaizumi T, Lee SH, Briley D, Rothwell PM: Antithrombotic drug use, cerebral microbleeds, and intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of published and unpublished studies. Stroke. 2010, 41 (6): 1222-1228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee SH, Kim BJ, Roh JK: Silent microbleeds are associated with volume of primary intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2006, 66 (3): 430-432.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Koennecke HC: Cerebral microbleeds on MRI: prevalence, associations, and potential clinical implications. Neurology. 2006, 66 (2): 165-171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, Viswanathan A, Al-Shahi Salman R, Warach S, Launer LJ, Van Buchem MA, Breteler MM: Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8 (2): 165-174.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Mogi M, Horiuchi M: Clinical interaction between brain and kidney in small vessel disease. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011, 2011: 306189-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho AH, Lee SB, Han SJ, Shon YM, Yang DW, Kim BS: Impaired kidney function and cerebral microbleeds in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2009, 73 (20): 1645-1648.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yokoyama S, Hirano H, Uomizu K, Kajiya Y, Tajitsu K, Kusumoto K: High incidence of microbleeds in hemodialysis patients detected by T2*-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2005, 45 (11): 556-560. discussion 560View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, De Zeeuw D, Hostetter TH, Lameire N, Eknoyan G: Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005, 67 (6): 2089-2100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Roos JF, Doust J, Tett SE, Kirkpatrick CM: Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C compared to serum creatinine for the estimation of renal dysfunction in adults and children–a meta-analysis. Clin Biochem. 2007, 40 (5–6): 383-391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Grubb A, Bjork J, Nyman U, Pollak J, Bengzon J, Ostner G, Lindstrom V: Cystatin C, a marker for successful aging and glomerular filtration rate, is not influenced by inflammation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2011, 71 (2): 145-149.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Randers E, Erlandsen EJ: Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of the renal function–a review. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999, 37 (4): 389-395.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bokenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J: Cystatin C–a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in children independent of age and height. Pediatrics. 1998, 101 (5): 875-881.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wu CK, Lin JW, Caffrey JL, Chang MH, Hwang JJ, Lin YS: Cystatin C and long-term mortality among subjects with normal creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rates: NHANES III (Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010, 56 (23): 1930-1936.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Seliger SL, Longstreth WT, Katz R, Manolio T, Fried LF, Shlipak M, Stehman-Breen CO, Newman A, Sarnak M, Gillen DL, Bleyer A, Siscovick DS: Cystatin C and subclinical brain infarction. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005, 16 (12): 3721-3727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wada M, Nagasawa H, Kawanami T, Kurita K, Daimon M, Kubota I, Kayama T, Kato T: Cystatin C as an index of cerebral small vessel disease: results of a cross-sectional study in community-based Japanese elderly. Eur J Neurol. 2010, 17 (3): 383-390.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Erlandsen EJ, Randers E, Kristensen JH: Evaluation of the Dade Behring N latex cystatin C assay on the Dade Behring nephelometer II system. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999, 59 (1): 1-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. O'Rourke MF, Safar ME: Relationship between aortic stiffening and microvascular disease in brain and kidney: cause and logic of therapy. Hypertension. 2005, 46 (1): 200-204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Levey AS: Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease. Kidney Int. 1990, 38 (1): 167-184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Houlihan CA, Tsalamandris C, Akdeniz A, Jerums G: Albumin to creatinine ratio: a screening test with limitations. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002, 39 (6): 1183-1189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993, 24 (1): 35-41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roob G, Schmidt R, Kapeller P, Lechner A, Hartung HP, Fazekas F: MRI evidence of past cerebral microbleeds in a healthy elderly population. Neurology. 1999, 52 (5): 991-994.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee SH, Bae HJ, Kwon SJ, Kim H, Kim YH, Yoon BW, Roh JK: Cerebral microbleeds are regionally associated with intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2004, 62 (1): 72-76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vernooij MW, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Wielopolski PA, Niessen WJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Breteler MM: Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds: the Rotterdam scan study. Neurology. 2008, 70 (14): 1208-1214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA: MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987, 149 (2): 351-356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. H.Katz M: Multivariable Analysis: A Practical Guide for Clinicians and Public Health Researchers. 2011, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, Kusek JW, Manzi J, Van Lente F, Zhang YL, Coresh J, Levey AS, CKD-EPI Investigators: Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012, 367 (1): 20-29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Ovbiagele B, Liebeskind DS, Pineda S, Saver JL: Strong independent correlation of proteinuria with cerebral microbleeds in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack. Arch Neurol. 2010, 67 (1): 45-50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY: Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351 (13): 1296-1305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ix JH, Shlipak MG, Chertow GM, Whooley MA: Association of cystatin C with mortality, cardiovascular events, and incident heart failure among persons with coronary heart disease: data from the heart and soul study. Circulation. 2007, 115 (2): 173-179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Shlipak MG, Katz R, Sarnak MJ, Fried LF, Newman AB, Stehman-Breen C, Seliger SL, Kestenbaum B, Psaty B, Tracy RP, Siscovick DS: Cystatin C and prognosis for cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in elderly persons without chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006, 145 (4): 237-246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shlipak MG, Katz R, Fried LF, Jenny NS, Stehman-Breen CO, Newman AB, Siscovick D, Psaty BM, Sarnak MJ: Cystatin-C and mortality in elderly persons with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 45 (2): 268-271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schreiber S, Bueche CZ, Garz C, Kropf S, Angenstein F, Goldschmidt J, Neumann J, Heinze HJ, Goertler M, Reymann KG, Braun H: The pathologic cascade of cerebrovascular lesions in SHRSP: is erythrocyte accumulation an early phase?. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32 (2): 278-290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Braun H, Schreiber S: Microbleeds in cerebral small vessel disease. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12 (8): 735-736.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schreiber S, Bueche CZ, Garz C, Braun H: Blood brain barrier breakdown as the starting point of cerebral small vessel disease? - New insights from a rat model. Exp Transl Stroke Med. 2013, 5 (1): 4-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Schiffrin EL, Lipman ML, Mann JF: Chronic kidney disease: effects on the cardiovascular system. Circulation. 2007, 116 (1): 85-97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jafar TH, Stark PC, Schmid CH, Landa M, Maschio G, de Jong PE, de Zeeuw D, Shahinfar S, Toto R, Levey AS, AIPRD Study Group: Progression of chronic kidney disease: the role of blood pressure control, proteinuria, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: a patient-level meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003, 139 (4): 244-252.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kimura Y, Kitagawa K, Oku N, Kajimoto K, Kato H, Tanaka M, Sakaguchi M, Hougaku H, Sakoda S, Hatazawa J: Blood pressure lowering with valsartan is associated with maintenance of cerebral blood flow and cerebral perfusion reserve in hypertensive patients with cerebral small vessel disease. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010, 19 (2): 85-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Appel LJ, Wright JT, Greene T, Kusek JW, Lewis JB, Wang X, Lipkowitz MS, Norris KC, Bakris GL, Rahman M, Contreras G, Rostand SG, Kopple JD, Gabbai FB, Schulman GI, Gassman JJ, Charleston J, Agodoa LY, African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension Collaborative Research Group: Long-term effects of renin-angiotensin system-blocking therapy and a low blood pressure goal on progression of hypertensive chronic kidney disease in African Americans. Arch Intern Med. 2008, 168 (8): 832-839.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ikram MA, Vernooij MW, Hofman A, Niessen WJ, van der Lugt A, Breteler MM: Kidney function is related to cerebral small vessel disease. Stroke. 2008, 39 (1): 55-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McClellan WM, Warnock DG, Judd S, Muntner P, Kewalramani R, Cushman M, McClure LA, Newsome BB, Howard G: Albuminuria and racial disparities in the risk for ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011, 22 (9): 1721-1728.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Neumann J, Ligtenberg G, Klein II, Koomans HA, Blankestijn PJ: Sympathetic hyperactivity in chronic kidney disease: pathogenesis, clinical relevance, and treatment. Kidney Int. 2004, 65 (5): 1568-1576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Hassan A, Hunt BJ, O'Sullivan M, Bell R, D'Souza R, Jeffery S, Bamford JM, Markus HS: Homocysteine is a risk factor for cerebral small vessel disease, acting via endothelial dysfunction. Brain. 2004, 127 (Pt 1): 212-219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Arismendi-Morillo GJ, Fernandez-Abreu MC, Vilchez-Barrios G, Molina-Viloria OM, Cardozo JJ: [Cerebrovascular disease: its relationship with cardiovascular and renal pathology in 134 clinical autopsies]. Rev Neurol. 2004, 39 (5): 410-414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Faraci FM, Brian JE: Nitric oxide and the cerebral circulation. Stroke. 1994, 25 (3): 692-703.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Masuo K, Lambert GW, Esler MD, Rakugi H, Ogihara T, Schlaich MP: The role of sympathetic nervous activity in renal injury and end-stage renal disease. Hypertens Res. 2010, 33 (6): 521-528.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Shoamanesh A, Kwok CS, Lim PA, Benavente OR: Postthrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage risk of cerebral microbleeds in acute stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2013, 8 (5): 348-356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Fan YH, Zhang L, Lam WW, Mok VC, Wong KS: Cerebral microbleeds as a risk factor for subsequent intracerebral hemorrhages among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003, 34 (10): 2459-2462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Iseki K, Kinjo K, Kimura Y, Osawa A, Fukiyama K: Evidence for high risk of cerebral hemorrhage in chronic dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 1993, 44 (5): 1086-1090.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Jeon SB, Kwon SU, Cho AH, Yun SC, Kim JS, Kang DW: Rapid appearance of new cerebral microbleeds after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2009, 73 (20): 1638-1644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Romero JR, Preis SR, Beiser A, Decarli C, Viswanathan A, Martinez-Ramirez S, Kase CS, Wolf PA, Seshadri S: Risk factors, stroke prevention treatments, and prevalence of cerebral microbleeds in the Framingham heart study. Stroke. 2014, 45 (5): 1492-1494.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/14/127/prepub

Copyright

© Oh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.