Skip to main content

Table 6 Efficacy outcome reporting for each included intervention

From: Pregabalin, the lidocaine plaster and duloxetine in patients with refractory neuropathic pain: a systematic review

 

Intervention

 

Pregabalin

Lidocaine plaster

Duloxetine

Mean Pain Scores-No. studies (no. patients receiving the intervention)+ reporting reduction in mean pain scores compared to baseline

No. studies reporting data for any pain intensity outcome

7

3

1

McGill questionnaire

2* (109)

  

Pain reduction measured by VRS

2* (81)

  

Pain intensity measured by NRS

1* (30)

1NR (32)

 

Pain intensity measured by BPI

2* (73)

  

Pain score measured by NPS-10, NPS-8 and NPS-4

 

1* (71)

 

Pain intensity measured by present pain intensity (PPI)

1* (81)

  

Percentage pain score reduction

 

1NR (16)

 

Pain severity measured by VAS

  

1* (18)

Quality of life-No. studies (no. patients receiving the intervention)+ reporting improvements in quality of life compared to baseline

No. studies reporting data for any quality of life outcome

4

1

0

SF-MPQ total, sensory and affective score

1*

  

Quality of life measured by the SF-12

1* (55)

  

Sleep interference measured by NRS

1* (55), 1NS (30)

  

Quality of sleep measured by VRS

1* (28)

  

Quality of sleep (instrument not reported)

 

1* (3)

 

Inference of mood measured by VRS

1* (28)

  

Daily activity measured by VRS

1* (28)

  

Function interference measured by NRS

1* (30)

  

Psychological stress measured by the Short Questionnaire on Current Burden

1* (55)

  

Pain associated distress measured by NRS

1* (30)

  

PGIC

1* (18)

  

Responders-No. studies (no. patients receiving the intervention)+ reporting data for outcome

No. studies reporting data for any pain relief outcome

4

4

0

Complete pain relief

1 (53)

2 (48)

 

range of percentages reported

25%

13-22%

 

A lot of pain relief

 

2 (48)

 

range of percentages reported

 

25-34%

 

Moderate pain relief

 

2 (48)

 

range of percentages reported

 

33-44%

 

Pain reduction of ≥ 50%

3 (158)

2 (7)

 

range of percentages reported

33-49%

100%a

 

Pain reduction 10-50%

2 (105)

1 (33)

 

range of percentages reported

17%b

NRc

 

Non-responders

3 (132)

2 (52)

 

range of percentages reported

26-46%

6-20%

 
  1. *Statistically significant; NS-not statistically significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.
  2. +Numbers of patients receiving the intervention of interest.
  3. aTwo case studies of 3 and 4 patients: the former reported all patients achieved 50% reduction in pain score, the latter reported improvements in all patients in an inconsistent manner.
  4. bOne study reported that 4 of 24 patients achieved pain relief of 10-25%. The second study reported 38 out of 78 evaluable patients experienced ≥ 30% reduction in pain from baseline.
  5. cOne study stated that patients experienced pain relief of 10%-50%, however it was unclear whether this referred to all patients.