Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
18 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edmond Teng |
26 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Perneczky |
28 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Manuel Fernandez |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Perneczky |
21 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edmond Teng |
17 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Manuel Fernandez |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
13 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Manuel Fernandez |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
13 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
7 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Manuel Fernandez |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
7 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
10 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Manuel Fernandez |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
28 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-10-87 |
You can find further information about peer review here.