Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
22 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Geertrui Vanhove |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
22 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arnold Gammaitoni |
3 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arpad Szallasi |
22 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Serpell |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
8 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Geertrui Vanhove |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
8 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
10 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Arnold Gammaitoni |
11 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Serpell |
6 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Geertrui Vanhove |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
8 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Geertrui Vanhove |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
8 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
11 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
11 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-10-92 |
You can find further information about peer review here.