Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
19 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jong-Ling Fuh |
7 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shiang-Ru Lu |
15 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - James Baraniuk |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
2 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jong-Ling Fuh |
6 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shiang-Ru Lu |
30 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - James Baraniuk |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
30 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jong-Ling Fuh |
20 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shiang-Ru Lu |
2 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - James Baraniuk |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
24 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - James Baraniuk |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
24 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
5 Mar 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Mar 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-11-30 |
You can find further information about peer review here.