Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - lea grinberg |
| 9 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Bak |
| 3 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 3 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 3 Dec 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 3 Dec 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 27 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - lea grinberg |
| 8 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 21 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 21 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 2 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Robert Rusina |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 2 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-11-50 |
You can find further information about peer review here.