Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Msall |
| 11 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muideen Bakare |
| 19 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Pasnak |
| 21 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Forns |
| 20 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gwendoline Quetoline Kandawasvika |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 31 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Pasnak |
| 6 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muideen Bakare |
| 22 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Msall |
| 10 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joan Forns |
| 27 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gwendoline Quetoline Kandawasvika |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 27 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 12 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Muideen Bakare |
| 22 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michael Msall |
| 23 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Gwendoline Quetoline Kandawasvika |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 23 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 23 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 29 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-12-147 |
You can find further information about peer review here.