Skip to main content

Table 3 The results of comparison of HPR (i.e., HPR classified as “present”) among MSA-P, MSA-C patients, and age-matched normal subjects

From: Hyperintense putaminal rim at 1.5 T: prevalence in normal subjects and distinguishing features from multiple system atrophy

Variables

MSA-P (n = 10)

MSA-C (n = 18)

Normal (n = 39)

P-value

Mean age ± standard deviation (age range)

57.9 ± 4.7 years

(52–64 years)

59.1 ± 4.2 years

(54–66 years)

57.0 ± 3.8 years

(50–66 years)

0.1883

Gender ratio

Men

40.0%

38.9%

53.9%

0.5614

 

Women

60.0%

61.1%

46.1%

 

Distribution of HPR

Right

60.0%

56.0%

51.0%

0.8710

 

Left

40.0%

44.0%

49.0%

 

Maximum anteroposterior dimension of HPR

Anterior edge ~ Anterior quarter

0.0%

5.5%

5.1%

0.0003*

 

Anterior edge ~ Anterior half

0.0%

16.7%

28.2%

 
 

Anterior edge ~ Anterior three quarters

0.0%

0.0%

23.1%

 
 

Posterior edge ~ Posterior quarter

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

 
 

Posterior edge ~ Posterior half

40.0%

5.6%

0.0%

 
 

Posterior edge ~ Posterior three quarters

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

 
 

Nearly full to full length

60.0%

72.2%

43.6%

 

Maximum transverse dimension of HPR

>2 mm

10.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0554

 

<2 mm

90.0%

100.0%

100.0%

 

Discontinuity of HPR

Present

80.0%

38.9%

28.2%

0.0112*

 

Absent

20.0%

61.1%

71.8%

 

Hypointensity of nearby putamen

Present

78.9%

51.6%

49.2%

0.0668

 

Absent

21.1%

48.4%

50.8%

 

Putaminal atrophy

Present

50.0%

11.1%

0.0%

<0.0001*

 

Absent

50.0%

88.9%

100.0%

 
  1. Note: “n” represents the number of putamina.
  2. * represents statistical significance.