From: The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment
Variable | Cut-off | Specificity | Sensitivity | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients | BE | NSS | TS | ||
Trial 1 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
< 4 | 88 | 100 | 1.7 | 3.2 | |
< 5 | 79 | 97 | 17 | 9.7 | |
< 6 | 57 | 94 | 40.7 | 22.6 | |
Trial 5 | < 6 | 100 | 100 | 11.8 | 6.5 |
< 8 | 88 | 100 | 23.7 | 6.5 | |
< 10 | 72 | 94 | 47.5 | 22.6 | |
Trial 1-5 | < 21 | 100 | 100 | 1.7 | 0 |
< 31 | 90 | 100 | 22 | 6.5 | |
< 39 | 75 | 94 | 44 | 22.6 | |
< 43 | 57 | 94 | 47.5 | 29 | |
Interference list | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
< 4 | 90 | 100 | 10.2 | 9.7 | |
< 5 | 75 | 100 | 34 | 32.3 | |
Trial 6 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
< 5 | 90 | 100 | 25.4 | 9.7 | |
< 7 | 72 | 100 | 45.8 | 19.3 | |
Trial 7 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
< 2 | 90 | 100 | 3.9 | 3.2 | |
< 7 | 72 | 100 | 50.8 | 29 | |
Trial 6-5 | < -2 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
< 1 | 90 | 100 | 18.6 | 9.7 | |
< 2 | 75 | 100 | 44 | 35.5 | |
Trial 7-5 | < -2 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
< 0 | 90 | 100 | 13.6 | 0 | |
< 2 | 63 | 100 | 32.2 | 12.9 | |
Recognition | < 4 | 100 | 100 | 3.9 | 0 |
< 8 | 90 | 100 | 15.3 | 9.7 | |
< 12 | 75 | 97 | 50.8 | 25.8 | |
Corrected recognition score | < 2 | 100 | 100 | 25.4 | 6.5 |
< 6 | 90 | 100 | 40.7 | 6.5 | |
< 11 | 72 | 94 | 66.1 | 51.6 | |
3recallednotrecog | > 4 | 100 | 100 | 5.1 | 0 |
> 1 | 81 | 91 | 66.1 | 19.3 | |
VLMT number of times the first word was recalled in trials 1 to 5 | < 2 | 100 | 100 | 6.8 | 3.2 |
< 4 | 78 | 84.9 | 25.4 | 16.1 | |
< 5 | 58 | 69.7 | 54.2 | 38.7 | |
VLMT number of times the last word was recalled in trials 1 to 5 | < 2 | 94 | 100 | 6.8 | 3.2 |
< 3 | 82 | 97 | 10.2 | 6.5 | |
< 4 | 67 | 93.9 | 22 | 22.6 |