Table 3 Mean MSIS-29 scores and change scores for patients and proxies at baseline and after treatment according to the transition ratings
From: The size of the treatment effect: do patients and proxies agree?
Not improveda (n = 25) | Improvedb (n = 17) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSIS-29 | Patients | Proxy respondents | Patients | Proxy respondents |
Physical scale baseline | 51.3 ± 16.5 | 51.0 ± 15.0 | 45.2 ± 20.9 | 44.2 ± 21.4 |
Physical scale after treatment | 51.1 ± 16.8 | 55.0 ± 15.0 | 28.8 ± 17.7 | 29.5 ± 19.0 |
Change on MSIS-29 physical scalec | -0.2 ± 12.8 | 4.0 ± 13.5 | -16.4 ± 16.4 | -14.7 ± 13.3 |
Responsiveness ratio | 1.29 | 1.09 | ||
Difference between change scoresd: | -4.2 ± 14.7 (p = 0.948) | -1.8 ± 15.1 (p = 0.733) | ||
95% CI of the difference | (-11.7 – 3.3) | (-12.2 – 8.6) | ||
ICC | 0.36 | 0.50 | ||
Psychological scale baseline | 30.7 ± 19.1 | 33.2 ± 18.3 | 32.5 ± 20.9 | 36.9 ± 23.5 |
Psychological scale after treatment | 30.7 ± 17.7 | 40.1 ± 22.3 | 23.4 ± 17.6 | 26.6 ± 16.8 |
Change on MSIS-29 psychological scalec | 0.0 ± 14.3 | 6.9 ± 19.9 | -9.1 ± 15.3 | -10.3 ± 16.3 |
Responsiveness ratio | 0.64 | 0.52 | ||
Difference between change scoresd: | -6.9 ± 18.3 (p = 0.544) | 1.1 ± 23.1 (p = 0.834) | ||
95% CI of the difference | (-16.7 – 3.0) | (-8.9 – 12.2) | ||
ICC | 0.42 | 0.0 | ||