Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Paleacu |
| 4 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dag Aarsland |
| 16 Mar 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Sabolek |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 16 Mar 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Diana Paleacu |
| 15 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dag Aarsland |
| 22 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Sabolek |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 22 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 28 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Michael Sabolek |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 28 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 10 Jun 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
| 10 Jun 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2377-9-23 |
You can find further information about peer review here.