Skip to main content

Table 4 Analysis 1: TOAST subtype vs. all other subtypes combined with smoking and HTN included in the regression model

From: Ethnic differences in ischemic stroke subtypes in young-onset stroke: the Stroke Prevention in Young Adults Study

 

Small vessel (n = 142)

Large artery (n = 68)

Cardioembolic (n = 181)

Cryptogenic (n = 485)

Sex

1.17 p = 0.42

1.50 p = 0.140

1.32 p = 0.115

0.96 p = 0.742

 (1 = male)

[0.80, 1.71]

[0.88, 2.56]

[0.94, 1.85]

[0.74, 1.25]

Ethnicity

1.36 p = 0.109

0.64 p = 0.092

1.03 p = 0.845

1.01 p = 0.950

 (1 = AA)

[0.93, 1.99]

[0.38, 1.08]

[0.74, 1.45]

[0.77, 1.31]

Age

2.56 p= 0.0002

2.38 p= 0.016

0.65 p= 0.014

0.91 p = 0.530

 (≥40)

[1.56, 4.22]

[1.18, 4.83]

[0.46, 0.92]

[0.69, 1.21]

Current smoker

1.05 p = 0.804

1.79 p= 0.024

0.66 p= 0.016

1.12 p = 0.380

 (1 = yes)

[0.73, 1.52]

[1.08, 2.98]

[0.47, 0.93]

[0.87, 1.46]

HTN

2.03 p= 0.0003

1.70 p= 0.048

0.94 p = 0.713

0.74 p= 0.027

 (1 = yes)

[1.38, 2.98]

[1.01, 2.88]

[0.66, 1.33]

[0.56, 0.97]

  1. Logistic regression performed with the three groups of sex, ethnicity, and age - comparing stroke subtype risk against all other stroke subtypes combined. The risk factors of smoking and HTN were added into the basic model. Significant results are bolded